
Originally Posted by
Shadow Lord
That is an interesting argument that I have wondered about myself... I.E. at what point did IBM lose it's brand power. I always have thought the decline started around the 486 era.... At that point it didn't have to be an "IBM" any more and a Compaq, Dell, Zeos or G2K was fine. By the Pentium era IBM was making commodity machines and following others lead. In the used market the PC, XT and AT I think demand a premium vs. a clone.The PS/2s have their own subculture but outside of that I don't see a huge bidding war say for an IBM PC300GL. Others, I am sure, would disagree...
I don't think IBM ever lost its brand power when it came to servers (quality wise), they just lost the public because of expensive as hell and no ISA/vlb slots on the PS/2 line and their cheaply made PS/1 line there after. IBM is still held in great regard for laptops before selling out to Lenovo.
There are people who either love high end white box (home built) machines or prefer to own on the big name brand machines to play with. And there are people who lusted after the dual PPro machines that only the big boys produced such as IBM of HP to name a few. You just don't have that many options for Socket 8 and they tend to be massive servers like the case of HP or cool desktops like the case of IBM.
What I collect: 68K/Early PPC Mac, DOS/Win 3.1 era machines, Amiga/ST, C64/128
Nubus/ISA/VLB/MCA/EISA cards of all types
Boxed apps and games for the above systems
Analog video capture cards/software and complete systems
Bookmarks