Image Map Image Map
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678
Results 71 to 74 of 74

Thread: Os/2

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    3,202
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Looks like some one else has taken up the OS/2 batten- http://www.techrepublic.com/article/...8-year-old-os/
    Thomas Byers (DRI)- "You'll have a million people using the A> [MS-DOS prompt] forever. You'll have five million using [nongraphic] menu systems such as Topview, Concurrent PC-DOS, Desq, and those types. But there'll be 50 to 100 million using the iconic-based interfaces."

  2. Default

    Looks like an OS/2 system won't be hard to find at all then, which is nice. I'll probably look into it after I get my TS1000 workings.

  3. #73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by krebizfan View Post
    I know IBM's had a big push in 1993 to migrate Personal Server 295s from AMP OS/2 1.3 to SMP 2.1. I never heard of anyone implementing it.
    Yes, the infamous 195 / 295 Parallan systems, neat-o for alpha-geeks. Best I knew, IBM withdrew them and either swapped them out for like systems or re-imbursed the customers.

    http://ps-2.kev009.com/ohlandl/8600/Server_195.html

  4. #74

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Caluser2000 View Post
    Looks like some one else has taken up the OS/2 batten- http://www.techrepublic.com/article/...8-year-old-os/
    I am curious, blue... One disturbing impression is the licensing model. The website is not as concise as one might prefer, but it seems to resemble IBM's AIX or AS/400 packages. This is NOT comforting.

    Also, what hardware does it support? If it dropped microchannel support, then it doesn't interest me.

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •