Image Map Image Map
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Has there ever been 68000-bit processors?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, USA
    Posts
    34,329
    Blog Entries
    18

    Default

    Well, you could classify by the largest integer on which the complete range of arithmetic and logical operations could be performed. That would confine the Z80 to 8 bits (the set of 16-bit operations is incomplete) and the 68K to 32 bits; the 8086 would be 16 bits.

    This, of course, doesn't count SIMD (vector) architectures.

    Using the width of the memory bus doesn't work either. Consider the CDC STAR--the memory interface to the CPU is 528 bits (includes parity). But it's nominally a 64 bit architecture. The big bus is for vector processing.

    Then there are the old variable-length systems (e.g. 1401, 1620). If you used the "complete set of arithmetic operations" criterion, even the lowly 360/20 would turn in some very high numbers (most of the arithmetic is implemented as SS packed decimal).

    It is a puzzlement.

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eudimorphodon View Post
    I'm pretty sure people have come to blows (beer bottles smashed on the bar, the whole enchilada) over whether or not the 68000 should be called a 16 or 32 bit processor, but I think the 32-bit-ness is pretty unequivocal in the case of the 68020.
    I've obviously been going to the wrong bars all my life.
    Quote Originally Posted by daver2 View Post
    Yes...

    Is a Zilog Z80 an 8 or 16 bit machine? It has 8 bit registers internally, but they can be ‘joined together’ to form 16 bit register pairs. To further confuse things, you can perform 16-bit arithmetic on some of the register pairs. I would still call the Z80 an 8-bit processor however.

    Churches have been built on less...

    Dave
    I think that was either a programmer's trick for dealing with 16-bit arithmetic or a kind of hackish bit-slice technique used on some systems that tried to use them in tandem to create a 16-bit or greater system, depending on what you're talking about. There was a lot of hacky stuff going on back then with the price difference between consumer grade chips and the more expensive 16+ bit chips.

  3. #13

    Default

    If you should want to play with a real 68000 and not one of the follow on's. You should get a Canon Cat. Although, you need to learn a little Forth, is can have an assembler to work at the machine level. You can use the Cat's exculent editor for your source code and then compile it on the CAT.
    Do note that if you get a machine that seems to have a working disk drive, do not attempt to remove the floppy until you talk to me. The drives are no longer available and can be easily destroyed.
    Dwight

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •