Announcement

Collapse

Forum etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


"PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

Blank screen on demand

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Blank screen on demand

    The thread title pretty much says it all, does anyone know of a utility to blank the screen on demand in Win98?

    I recall having such a program for Win3.1 where you could move the mouse pointer to the upper right hand corner and it would immediately blank the screen. Can't seem to find it now, and I'm not sure that it would play nicely with Win98, anyway.

    Kent

    #2
    Idlewild??
    I am physcologically dependant on a TV show which features a fictional starship that studies gaseous anomalies around Uranus, while watching out for Klingons.

    Comment


      #3
      "Idlewild" kinda rings a bell. It's been so long ago that I may have confused it with something in OS/2.

      I'm probably the world's worst about not labeling floppies, don't really care to go through the leaning tower o' flops looking for that program. I usually leave my computer on and just turn off the monitor when I leave it for a while. It would be much easier (and spiffier) to simply shove the pointer to the upper right corner.

      Don't care much for screen savers, if I should leave a process running I like to be able to just look through the door to see what the process status is. Anyway, a lot of the so called "screen savers" aren't. Some of them have elements on the screen that stay in the same position. Even my old Atari 5200 would at least rotate the color palette if left in "pause" for very long.

      Kent

      Comment


        #4
        If nothing else, in Win98 you can set the energy saving functions to shut off the screen after one minute of no activity. Default is 15 minutes, I think.
        Anders Carlsson

        Comment


          #5
          Yep, I had the Win98 screen blanker set up, but didn't like the idea of it blanking when I had a long, intense process going (video rendering).

          I Googled Idlewild, that's not what I had before. I may end up going through the tower o' flops anyway. May even label 'em.

          Comment


            #6
            I just turn off the monitor! )
            Generic and Amstrad CPC based Programs written in Turbo Pascal 3

            Comment


              #7
              Indeed, turning off the monitor is the method of choice at the moment. However, I'm wondering if the numerous power cycles is more detrimental than screen blanking.

              During screen blanking, only the high voltage section is shut down (also the crt filaments, being derived from HV), the low voltage power remains on. The surge of a cold start is usually the killer in any electronic device. Well, some electrical devices, too. How many times have you had a light bulb fail while it's turned on? How many times have you had a light bulb fail right when it's turned on? That flash and pop are always a bit startling, aren't they?

              Kent

              Comment


                #8
                DimensionDude wrote:

                > Indeed, turning off the monitor is the method of
                > choice at the moment. However, I'm wondering if the
                > numerous power cycles is more detrimental than screen
                > blanking.

                > During screen blanking, only the high voltage section
                > is shut down (also the crt filaments, being derived
                > from HV), the low voltage power remains on. The surge
                > of a cold start is usually the killer in any
                > electronic device. Well, some electrical devices,
                > too. How many times have you had a light bulb fail
                > while it's turned on? How many times have you had a
                > light bulb fail right when it's turned on? That flash
                > and pop are always a bit startling, aren't they?

                We've found the light bulb to fail regardless of how many
                times it's been switched on & off - possibly because we get
                the cheap products, instead of the ones which you pay a little
                bit more for.

                The computer monitor I have on my old Pentium is -still-
                working & must have been switched on & off Thousands of times.
                The biggest issues I found with Monitors has been dust (which
                gets into those old CRT screens) & the leads on the back of
                where the wires inside them ware out due to large amounts of
                fidging with them from moving them around.

                If your having problems with your monitors due to Voltages
                then perhaps you need more protection from Surges or Spikes
                with voltage regulators.

                CP/M User.
                Generic and Amstrad CPC based Programs written in Turbo Pascal 3

                Comment


                  #9
                  It's true, newer (for various definitions of "newer") equipment is more robust than the older stuff. Power cycling shouldn't affect it much, but there is still a deterioration.

                  "Surge" was a poor choice of terms on my part, "inrush current" is the more correct term. A standard surge suppressor won't limit the inrush current.

                  No monitor problems here, just looking for a more elegant solution than simply turning off the power. Heh, I'm not even putting any wear on the monitor's power switch, I turn it on and off with a power distribution panel.

                  Kent

                  Comment


                    #10
                    i don't know if you can do it in xp, but in win 3.1 i used a trick that i read in the book (win 3.1 bible?) where you insert .scr within the system.ini file, in the list of file types that can be run, then create a desktop icon or hotkey combo for the screen blank screen saver file, and then you have a quick way to blank the screen.

                    i used to use it all the time, but i had mine set to starfield

                    chris
                    The vic rocks!

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by USSEnterprise
                      Idlewild??

                      wasn't Idlewild the screensaver program included with the windows 3.0 entertainment pack?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X