Announcement

Collapse

Forum etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


"PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

Rainbow Windows

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Rainbow Windows

    I'm trying to track down disk images that prove the existance of Windows 1 for the Rainbow 100, plus to try it myself.

    So far all I have found was a clip in the Rainbow 100 Wikipedia entry:

    DEC itself ported Microsoft Windows 1.0 to the Rainbow.
    Further searching that up found a message from a guy named Fred Einstein who said here that:
    Windows 1.0 which was adapted for the Rainbow at DEC by a guy named Alpo Kalio (a brilliant engineer). Windows ran on the hardware-assisted graphics card.
    From there however I hit a dead end as Google says there are a lot of people by that name.
    [Need something to waste time on? Click here to visit my YouTube channel CelGenStudios]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [No time for videos? Click here to visit my Twitter feed @CelGenStudios]

    = Excellent space heater

    #2
    Per your request, I've looked through my copy of the Spring 1984 Rainbow Handbook for references to Windows and Microsoft.

    There are no references to MS-Windows, but there are to DESQ, described as a "Windowing System" capable of allowing the user to simultaneously run and exchange data between multiple MS-DOS applications. It required a Mouse [Logitech or Microsoft] and MS-DOS.

    The catalog lists:
    • DESQ is a Quarterdeck Office Systems product (DEC order code: QA691-C3)
    • MS-DOS v2.05 (DEC order code: QV062-A3) is listed under DEC products, not Microsoft.


    The fact that MS-DOS is listed under DEC products indicates to me that DEC chose to customize it for the Rainbow themselves, and therefore lends credence to the notion that they might later have done so with MS-Windows too. However, MS-Windows 1.0 was not released until November 1985, so obviously it's not reflected in this document.

    From the descriptions of MS-Windows v1, it's capabilities lagged behind DESQ's until at least Windows v2.0 released in 1987, and wasn't taken seriously until v3.0. Throughout this period, MACs were the preeminent "Windowing" platform.

    The earliest Windows version I found commonly in use was for a tape-backup system which ran under Windows 286 [v2.x], but on PCs connected to a Novell network, not Rainbows or Turbowed (286) Rainbows.

    I hope that perspective eventually helps you in your quest.

    Comment


      #3
      Hmm. Interesting.
      Your handbook is also older than my Rainbow which had parts of it at least built as late as 1985. Never used or seen DESQ before though. That gap of a few months must of had something happen in it.
      Closest exposure to the older versions of a windowing OS besides the mas was Windows 2.01 on a Model 30 and 1.01 on a PC6300.
      [Need something to waste time on? Click here to visit my YouTube channel CelGenStudios]
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      [No time for videos? Click here to visit my Twitter feed @CelGenStudios]

      = Excellent space heater

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by NeXT View Post
        Hmm. Interesting.
        Your handbook is also older than my Rainbow which had parts of it at least built as late as 1985. Never used or seen DESQ before though. That gap of a few months must of had something happen in it....
        The first MAC TV advertisement was January 22, 1984. By May, the entire industry was beginning to take note of 70,000 units sold.

        Personally, I think the industry was caught off guard, confused by the prior offering "Lisa" which failed to get traction primarily due to it's high price point.

        Once the GUI caught on, Microsoft realized it had to adapt or die. In a way, DEC never did realize it's error, and failed to the very end with most of it's user interface offerings from then on. Management preferred to go after IBM's primary market, stating in a board meeting "We would rather have 2% of IBM's [Mainframe] business, than all the customers we now have." [yes - that's as direct a quote as I can recall]

        So, despite being then "On Top", DEC mismanaged their superior position into oblivion. I can recall the day the news of that board decision reached us as a DEC VAR. Changes to pricing policies soon followed, among them elimination of the once substantial discount to Educational institutions. This more than any other, began the long down-trend that would culminate in future students graduating unfamiliar with, and unable to use DEC products.

        If porting Windows for Rainbow did indeed occur, I'll bet is was a renegade effort within the company, more than the strategic move it needed to be.

        It will be interesting to learn what you uncover as a result of your searches.

        Comment


          #5
          I have never seen Windows 1.0. How would it (or DESQ) have compared to P/OS and Synergy running on a Pro350/380?

          Lou

          Comment


            #6
            I have Windows 1.01 for the DEC Rainbow. It used to be available through the Latrobe archives years ago. I'm not sure DEC ever "released" it, but it exists. I'll dig up the original distributions I have, but it is somewhat of a mess. I don't think anyone has ever sorted out how exactly to use a mouse with it.

            Windows 2 and 3.0 were also available for the 'bow, but neither was ported by DEC. Win 3.0 doesn't actually require a 286 accelerator, but it sure helps.
            Jeff Armstrong
            Still a Rainbow 100 user...

            Comment


              #7
              Thank you for chiming in PrintStar.Your effort would be greatly appreciated.
              Windows 1 included mouse support integrated into itself, right? I didn't check before. I first installed the mouse driver, then installed Windows.
              I could probably test to see if the original Microsoft serial mouse (or the older InPort mouse with a serial adapter) works.
              [Need something to waste time on? Click here to visit my YouTube channel CelGenStudios]
              --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              [No time for videos? Click here to visit my Twitter feed @CelGenStudios]

              = Excellent space heater

              Comment


                #8
                About using a mouse on a rainbow....

                When I had one in the late 80s, I ran Autocad V2.6 on it. I had a Logitech C7 mouse connected to the Rainbow. The trick was that the although the rainbow comm port could be configured, the mouse also had to be set up to match the baud rate. I would always have to send a command string to the mouse to set the appropriate baud rate, then start autocad, and then the mouse would work. Somewhere around here I have a memo from Autodesk (on autodesk letterhead) that provided the appropriate baud rate change string to make the C7 work properly.

                I would not be surprised if Windows 1 would also work with an appropriately configured C7.

                Lou

                Comment


                  #9
                  A Logitech mouse might work with Rainbow Windows 1. I've tried a Microsoft serial mouse many times before to no avail with Rainbow Windows 1. I seem to remember seeing snippets in messages that suggested the mouse needed to be connected via the printer port (which is just a serial port on the 'bow) for Windows. It also seems likely that it might use a DEC hockeypuck of some sort similar to its younger brother, the VAXmate.
                  Jeff Armstrong
                  Still a Rainbow 100 user...

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X