Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules and Etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Rule 1: Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Rule 2: Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Rule 3: Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


Rule 4: "PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Rule 5: Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

Compaq Portable POST error

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Compaq Portable POST error

    Howdy, all

    I've taken a bit of a look around, and the best I can come up with for the persistent error "301" on my Compaq portable 8088 is a keyboard error- but the keyboard is present and operational.

    The only thing I can see on the board is what looks like the remains of a capacitor across two traces- snipped off at the base of the legs.

    My question is thus: was my research correct, and is 301 indeed a keyboard failure? If so, is it anything specific, or a real generic error (being a low number in the 300's I'm guessing so).


    Thanks

    --Phil

    #2
    It could be a stuck key. Is '301' all you get or is there more, like 'xy 301' or something like that, where x and y are numbers?
    PM me if you're looking for 3" or 5" floppy disks. EMail For everything else, Take Another Step

    Comment


      #3
      No. I've seen nnnn 201 when I've done things wrong with the memory, but the 301 is always just by itself.

      I rebuilt the keyboard the way a few here have- foam padding and emergency blanket. Even with the keyboard stripped naked and the board by itself it still throws the 301.

      --Phil

      Comment


        #4
        Can you try a different keyboard?
        PM me if you're looking for 3" or 5" floppy disks. EMail For everything else, Take Another Step

        Comment


          #5
          Unfortunately I don't have one. It's the funny built-in item that has a strange square Amphenol plug on the end, buried down inside the case- I'm guessing it's XT standard communications, but doesn't have the standard DIN plug.

          --Phil

          Comment


            #6
            This is an original Compaq Portable or Compaq Portable Plus? The foam pads are notorious for disintegrating so you might very well have a one of the metal discs laying on the board inside.
            This space intentionally left blank [ ].

            Comment


              #7
              Yes it's the Compaq Portable or Plus from the description of the square connector running into the back of the chassis. You said the keyboard does work though? I do agree it could be a stuck key or something throwing that error. If you disconnect the keyboard I guess you'd still end up with a keyboard error though lol. I can't remember, does it have a connector for an external AT keyboard? I'm thinking not but can't remember from memory alone. I only disconnected the keyboard recently but do remember it seemed possible to connect incorrectly back to the main board, I can't remember if it was truly keyed to prevent that or if they just figured you wouldn't go inside of the system too often for it to be an issue.
              Looking to acquire: IBM 5100, Altair 8800

              Comment


                #8
                It's a Portable Plus, from what I understand. All the keys had disintegrated inside and none worked, so it's been thoroughly apart, had new foam and new Mylar assembled with some good contact adhesive. All the keys function normally.

                With the keyboard unplugged it still throws 301, yes.

                The connectors are keyed on both ends (the outside is a top-hat shape, can't insert it upside down into the keyboard on the inside nor the motherboard).

                Beyond that, the keyboard operates as I'd expect it to... I can live with the error code (spurious or otherwise), but I was wondering if it was a keyboard fault, yes.

                --Phil

                Comment


                  #9
                  ...and now 7001 201 PARITY CHECK 2

                  Yet another MOSTEK chip gone bad. I think I left the spares at work. Bah.

                  --Phil

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Hi PhilipA,

                    In Compaq desktops, 301 was a generic Keyboard Failure. I'm not 100% sure, but I would assume that it's the same for the Portable.

                    Originally posted by PhilipA View Post
                    With the keyboard unplugged it still throws 301, yes.
                    301 is probably equivalent to a modern generic Keyboard Failure (thrown when the keyboard is missing), so I'm not surprised that the Portable throws a 301 still.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      could his keyboard controller chip be on the way out?
                      Nothing beats the roar of a 36yr old drive coming to life after a decade in storagg

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by k2x4b524[ View Post
                        could his keyboard controller chip be on the way out?
                        Maybe...

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Given the condition of this computer when I got it, that could well be the case.

                          --Phil

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by PhilipA View Post
                            Given the condition of this computer when I got it, that could well be the case.

                            --Phil
                            That seems like a logical reason that you're getting an error. I have no idea how you'd test for that though...

                            Comment


                              #15
                              I don't know either. Despite the error message, the keyboard works just fine.

                              I've put it down to a quirk, for now. Unfortunately the BIOS isn't particularly verbose when you send it through POST.

                              Phil

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X