Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules and Etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Rule 1: Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Rule 2: Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Rule 3: Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


Rule 4: "PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Rule 5: Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

Compaq Portable III - how to get 640KB of base RAM?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Compaq Portable III - how to get 640KB of base RAM?

    Hi all,

    Edit: I found the missing 128KB, they are right next to the RAM sockets:
    ram.jpg

    I guess the chips themselves or something on their path is bad, and I need to debug this. Leaving the rest of my post for posterity - thanks everyone for being my rubber ducks.

    Any suggestions on how to debug the broken chips welcome.

    Cheers
    mikerofone

    I cannot wrap my head around how one would get 640KB of base memory in a Compaq Portable III, even though that seems to have been the default config. I cannot find any information online about how base memory works on that machine, only on extended/expanded memory (see last page in this pdf which claims that 640KB are on the mainboard). Does anyone have a manual? I could only find Compaq Portable 386 documentation online, hardly anything on the III.

    Mine came with the switches etc set for 640KB of base RAM, but it complains about memory errors unless I set it to 512KB. Digging into the configuration options, I do not understand how this machine would be configured for 640KB, unless 320KB RAM modules are a thing?

    The mainboard takes two 30-pin SIMM RAM modules, in the bottom middle:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]66828[/ATTACH]

    These are populated with 2x256KB modules (I googled the markings on the chips). Here's a closeup:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]66829[/ATTACH]

    So it makes perfect sense that only 512KB work - there are simply 128KB missing. There is an additional way to add memory, a Compaq memory expansion card that can be configured for XMS or "Compaq Expanded Memory":
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]66830[/ATTACH]
    It was populated with 2x256KB when I got it, but I replaced them with the 1MB SIMMs I had lying around. These work perfectly fine in both XMS and Compaq EMS mode.
    However, that still leaves the hole between 512-1024KB; I couldn't make any of that RAM be used for base memory.

    There's a third memory card that came with the computer, but it was a regular ISA card that was installed in the external ISA extension box. However, the ISA extension module seems to have a short that I have yet to debug, so I haven't been able to see what happens when that card is plugged in.
    This is the card, holding what seems to be 2MB of RAM in 18x1MBit chips:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]66831[/ATTACH]
    Given that it has to be installed in the optional, bulky ISA extension box, I highly doubt that the "default" of 640KB base RAM requires such a card to be present.

    The configuration stickers in the case don't bring any clarity for me:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]66833[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]66832[/ATTACH]
    1. The "No Extended Memory / Select Address Bank XXX" jumpers in the left image control how much of the RAM on the expansion board (RAM2) are configured as XMS. One can have none, some, or all banks configured for XMS; the rest becomes EMS. I've tried various combinations, nothing added more base.
    2. I'm not 100% sure what DIP switches 3 and 4 control exactly, since I don't know what "640KB + XXX" is supposed to mean. I've stuffed 2 1MB SIMMs into the mainboard sockets and tried various combinations of these, but I never got it to recognize more than 512KB.


    If I don't install any RAM at all, the computer immediately throws an error before even attempting to POST. I was curious whether there should be 128KB soldered onto the mainboard, but that doesn't seem to be the case.

    Any suggestions welcome! Only having 512KB RAM available in DOS is quite annoying.

    Cheers
    mikerofone
    Attached Files
    Last edited by mikerofone; March 5, 2021, 08:58 AM.

    #2
    I found http://www.1000bit.it/ad/bro/compaq/CompaqProtable3.pdf which on page 10 clearly states that the 640KB should be somewhere on the mainboard. The "motherboard" section of https://oldcrap.org/2018/11/12/compaq-portable-iii has some very high res pictures of the mainboard and RAM chips, which are the same as the ones that I have. So these 128KB have to come from somewhere else.

    I guess need to find those chips and hopefully can figure out what's wrong with them.

    If I set the DIP switches to 640KB, the errors I get are:
    • Code:
      080000 F000 201-Memory Error
      during POST on cold boot, counting RAM stops at 512KB.
    • The machine can boot, and running Compaq Setup yields
      Code:
      Memory Size error
      on start, and then clarifies it as
      Code:
      memory parity Error occurred during the sizing of memory
      , suggesting that the dip switches might be set incorrectly. The setup only reports 512KB of RAM, ignoring all extended memory.
    • If instead of booting, I soft-reset using Ctrl+Alt+Del after the failed POST, the computer prints
      Code:
      Parity Check 2 080000 000
      and then locks up hard.


    The service manual for the Portable 286 describes the error code format on PDF page 34. Copying here for reference:

    COMPAQ PORTABLE 286 Memory Error Codes
    Memory error codes are in the XX000B YYZZ format.
    • XX equals the 128 Kbyte memory segment (bank) in which an error is detected.
    • 000 is always equal to 000 (not used)
    • B identifies whether the defective memory chip is in the high byte or the low byte of the memory bank.
    • When B = 0, YY defines the defective chip row location within the low byte of the memory bank.
    • When B = 1, ZZ defines the defective chip row location within the high byte of the memory bank.


    [...]

    COMPAQ PORTABLE 286 Memory Configuration
    ================================================== ============================
    RAM Type Error Code Memory See
    xx Value Device Location Table
    Code:
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    64 Kbyte       00 to 02 (0 - 256 Kbytes) System Board 5.4-1
    256 Kbyte      00 to 08 (0 - 640 Kbytes) System Board 5.4-2
    64 Kbyte or    10 to 2E (1 - 3 megabytes) Memory Expansion Board 5.4-3
    256 Kbyte 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    NOTE: xx codes 0A to 0F represent the memory space for the video memory and
    system ROMs. Errors in the video memory or system ROM space are not reported
    in the XX000B YYZZ error message format.
    ================================================== ============================
    Applying the same logic here, the issue seems to be in the last 64KB of the memory range since xx=08, and affecting the low byte since B=0. The YY=F0 value cannot be translated using that table. Hrmpf. I haven't found the service manual for the III floating around anywhere, neither schematics. I'm afraid my best guess is to replace the couple chips one by one until the problem goes away / changes?
    Last edited by mikerofone; March 5, 2021, 09:32 AM.

    Comment

    Working...
    X