Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules and Etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Rule 1: Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Rule 2: Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Rule 3: Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


Rule 4: "PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Rule 5: Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

How to Post (On topic vs Off Topic)

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Yeah that's true, and if I was doing a 486 Win95 build I'd probably post in there, but for general 95/98 I'd expect to be hanging out in Club Pentium or one of the general forums further down. I was also somewhat taking queues from this:

    Originally posted by mbbrutman View Post
    Windows 95 and 98 are definitely off topic ...
    I ran Windows 95 on a 386 once though, but admittedly it was only once!
    Twitter / YouTube

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by SpidersWeb View Post
      Yeah that's true, and if I was doing a 486 Win95 build I'd probably post in there, but for general 95/98 I'd expect to be hanging out in Club Pentium or one of the general forums further down. I was also somewhat taking queues from this:



      I ran Windows 95 on a 386 once though, but admittedly it was only once!
      I think the word you want is 'cues.'

      Yes, this thread is ancient and has not been updated in many years. I don't think anybody expects us to go back and keep something like this up to date proactively. But now that it has been pointed out it should be updated.

      In general, 32 bit operating systems are still not exactly what we call "vintage." But at least that particular software (Win 9x) is getting close to 20 years old now, not like it was when the thread was first started. The 386/486 and first generation Pentium sub-forums are appropriate places for the hardware. And I think if a Windows 95 question comes up in the software section nobody is going to get too bent out of shape.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by SpidersWeb View Post
        ...
        I ran Windows 95 on a 386 once though, but admittedly it was only once!
        FWIW, my main Win 95 box years ago was a 386SX-20 with 5MB of RAM and two Rodime 70MB ST506-interface MFM hard drives, later updated to a Maxtor 690MB ESDI drive. I can't say I ran Win95 on it; 'walked Win 95 on it' is the better statement. It was definitely not mainstream. Win95 on a 486SX-20 was doable, though, especially with 8MB or more.
        --
        Thus spake Tandy Xenix System III version 3.2: "Bughlt: Sckmud Shut her down Scotty, she's sucking mud again!"

        Comment


          #34
          I still have Win95 OSR2 installed on a 386/20 with a 9GB FH SCSI drive. It works and, with DOSLFN, I get FAT32 functions even in DOS CLI mode.

          It's not fast, but that really depends on what you're doing. Web browsing? Not so much, but ftp, Win32 support, sure.
          Reach me: vcfblackhole _at_ protonmail dot com.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by lowen View Post
            FWIW, my main Win 95 box years ago was a 386SX-20 with 5MB of RAM and two Rodime 70MB ST506-interface MFM hard drives, later updated to a Maxtor 690MB ESDI drive. I can't say I ran Win95 on it; 'walked Win 95 on it' is the better statement. It was definitely not mainstream. Win95 on a 486SX-20 was doable, though, especially with 8MB or more.
            Windows 95 is pretty light. It runs quickly on my 486/33 with 24 MB RAM

            Of course 386/20 with 5 MB is a lot slower

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by mbbrutman View Post
              I think the word you want is 'cues.'
              Thanks, yes it was, I don't think I'd ever actually written that phrase before.

              If a "Windows 95/98/OS2 Warp" area was being considered I'd put a vote in. Many of us use them as tweeners, and they're the DOS PC of yesteryear for the younger generation of collectors. I don't consider them "vintage" but still feel they're part of what we do.
              Twitter / YouTube

              Comment


                #37
                I think Windows 95 should be on topic. Heck, it's 22 years old.

                Comment

                Working...
                X