danielbooneamerica
Experienced Member
Does anyone need some 100ft bus & tag cables?
I mean, it would make for a great conversational piece but where the heck did you find 100 foot cables in this decade??
Had them stored in a couple of Storagetek silos they gave me.
Ah the STK silos. When I was at NCAR we had 5 of them, all interconnected with pass through ports. They were part of the Mass Storage Server, a multi-terabyte tape archive with T9840 and T9940 tape drives. That archive grew to multi-petabyte size with the silo follow on SL8500 linear tape libraries libraries and T10000 tape drives. I always liked the silos better, those grabber arms flying around in the circular path looked a bit more dangerous than the robots of the SL8500.
Ah the STK silos. When I was at NCAR we had 5 of them, all interconnected with pass through ports. They were part of the Mass Storage Server, a multi-terabyte tape archive with T9840 and T9940 tape drives. That archive grew to multi-petabyte size with the silo follow on SL8500 linear tape libraries libraries and T10000 tape drives. I always liked the silos better, those grabber arms flying around in the circular path looked a bit more dangerous than the robots of the SL8500.
That's pretty close to the limit, which was 200 feet for byte/block/selector channels. Each control unit had an "equivalent length" which had to be added to the actual length. Some control units were surprisingly "long" - it wasn't actual length of wiring inside the control unit, but propagation delay. These longer cables were useful in connection a computer room to multiple "peripheral rooms", but in larger 370 configurations this started to cause serious issues when designing a physical layout that also met the maximum length requirements. Switching to fiber (either native on the processor or as extenders) helped a lot.Does anyone need some 100ft bus & tag cables?
Does anyone need some 100ft bus & tag cables?