Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules and Etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Rule 1: Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Rule 2: Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Rule 3: Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


Rule 4: "PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Rule 5: Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

RSC-FORTH v1.5

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • exidyboy
    replied
    Originally posted by Aeroraptor View Post

    According to the manual and stack of papers I got with it (one of them being an ad) say it's from around fall 83, and was made by a company called Rockwell International.
    While the OP hasn't logged in for 10 years if anyone else has documentation for this (actually) New Micros of Dallas NMIX-0011 FORTH development board I would be very interested in getting scans as I just bought one off ebay.

    The large manual for RSC FORTH does indeed live up to the OP's claims and can be found at the link below but I am after the manuals for the hardware itself.
    http://www.smallestplcoftheworld.org...27s_Manual.pdf

    Leave a comment:


  • rw6hrm
    replied
    If anibody need R65FR1 image (RSC-Forth V1.7), see link for archive http://www.4e4th.com/RSC_Forth_V1.7.zip or mirror https://vk.com/doc-72949118_437147289

    Leave a comment:


  • dave_m
    replied
    Originally posted by Gerardcjat View Post
    The first link seems to be for the FORTH EPROMs that will run in the AIM65 starting at $B000 through $CFFF using AIM65 Monitor routines.
    The second link seems to be for the R65FR1 that will run the the RSC Forth board at $2000 through $3FFF.

    The ROM images I've seen on the web are usually for the AIM65.

    Leave a comment:


  • gslick
    replied
    Originally posted by Gerardcjat View Post
    Hi,
    Did you see this ebay item ?? :
    http://www.ebay.fr/itm/291438091377
    Aren't those ROM images already available here?
    http://www.classiccmp.org/cini/systems.htm
    http://www.classiccmp.org/cini/zips/aim_roms.zip
    http://www.classiccmp.org/cini/zips/forth_pl65roms.zip

    Leave a comment:


  • Gerardcjat
    replied
    Originally posted by rw6hrm View Post
    Hi
    To build a 65F11-based computer I'm looking for 65FR1. This chip is difficult to acquire in our country, but does anyone have a firmware dump of 65FR1? I think that use a simply UW-ROM will be cheaper... Thanks.
    Hi,
    Did you see this ebay item ?? :
    http://www.ebay.fr/itm/Rockwell-AIM-...IAAOSwstxVNIHQ

    and this one also ??

    http://www.ebay.fr/itm/R65FR1P1-7-Se...4AAOSwyQtVtLUe
    Last edited by Gerardcjat; December 19, 2015, 06:03 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • inotarobot
    replied
    Excellent score.

    Well done. Always pays to accept with 'grace and smile' things that are being offered to you; even if much of it is really not in your primary field of interest or you know full well at first glance is junk.

    Often leads, as you found out, to a subsequent lot of items arriving into your possession, amongst which is the 'gem', as you saw with the Forth board.

    Generally I find, providing you have the room to store "the gifts", its worth keeping the other persons 'treasures' a few weeks to a month or so, as they just might come around with a stunning and rare extra bit for 'item xyx", and that item 'xyx' you hate to admit ,you threw in trash the day after it was given to you, as junk.

    Having moved a few times now, many of my older items are scattered into different storage boxes, located in 3 or 4 places, so its difficult to put all things together again.

    Need a big shed on level ground with easy access and 6 months to sort. OK I also need to win a lottery to have the spare cash to take the time to sort and combine.

    Leave a comment:


  • rw6hrm
    replied
    Hi
    To build a 65F11-based computer I'm looking for 65FR1. This chip is difficult to acquire in our country, but does anyone have a firmware dump of 65FR1? I think that use a simply UW-ROM will be cheaper... Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aeroraptor
    replied
    Yes, I'd very much like to scan the manual, however at the moment I have no scanner (or access to a scanner) with a top sheet feeder, and that's the only effective way to scan this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ksarul
    replied
    And a very nice find. Is there any thought of trying to do a scan of the manual to preserve it for posterity? A lot of these older systems manuals only exist in miniscule numbers, many less than the remaining examples of the boards, which is unfortunate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dwight Elvey
    replied
    Hi
    Rockwell was a great supporter of Forth for embedded applications.
    They first made the AIM65. This was a traditional developemnt board
    except it included a small thermal printer( I have one of these ).
    The sold several different ROM sets for these. The default was
    Forth but they also had a BASIC. They had a few developement
    application ROMs as well. these included an assembler, PLI language
    ( similar to PLM ).
    The board was similar in operation to the KIM/SIM boards of the time.
    They were used in many embedded low run application. I once helped
    debug some code for a disk ceritifier(sp?) that Seagate used.
    Later Rockwell came out with the F11. I was vary popular for medium
    run application ( you know, 20 to 1000 each ). They had the development
    board that you have but many created their own boards.
    16K is a lot of code in Forth. It is about 64K or more in C, so you can
    write quite a bit.
    The Forth used is basically FIG Forth as I recall. I still use Forth for
    any code I write for my self, even though I do some C++ at work.
    I find Forth more usedful for creating my "one ofs".
    Dwight

    Leave a comment:


  • Aeroraptor
    started a topic RSC-FORTH v1.5

    RSC-FORTH v1.5

    I posted this over at the 68kMLA, but I realized people here might also be interested. (Edited copy/paste)

    So, about two weeks ago a guy to ask if I was interested in some old equipment he was getting rid of, of course I'd take it so I said sure and later he swung by the house with a bunch of old fairly generic PC stuff, mostly cables and basic cards. He said he'd be by again soon with a bunch more, once he saw how positive my reaction to the old equipment was. Most of it was pretty standard, several new Etherlink II cards, couple PCI video cards, baby AT mobo with a Pent Pro, laplink setups, ya know- basic 90s PC stuff.

    About a week after that, three days ago, he came by with something really cool. A little, and I mean little, this thing is 2" thick, 4" wide, and 6" long, black box and a manual. A big manual. The box had a single RS232 db25 port and a reset switch (and an external PSU, rated at 9v 300ma). However I've since added a power switch and made a socket/plug for the power supply so it's detachable. According to the guy, and the manual, this is an RSC-FORTH, or Rockwell Single Chip FORTH development/hobbyist board. According to the manual and stack of papers I got with it (one of them being an ad) say it's from around fall 83, and was made by a company called Rockwell International. It is an entirely self sustained computer, complete with parallel-type headers and a low-level floppy drive interface. The processor is a Rockwell R65F11, a 1MHz, 40 pin, chip based off the 6502 with some enhancements. Ones I see straight off are that it has room for 3K ROM and 192B RAM, as well as a direct TTL based serial interface, to bring it to RS232C specs you just need a handful of discrete parts, all of which are on my board so it works as normal serial. My board also has a power regulator on it, so anything from 6 to 10v DC works. In the 3K of ROM is a very basic, but still usable, implementation of the FORTH development language. Basic, but still very usable.

    To make it more usable, there are three chip sockets, two of mine are filled: one 2K RAM chip and one ROM. The RAM is a standard CDM6116E2 chip, the ROM is another Rockwell part, R65FR1, running also at 1MHz. It contains the full version of the FORTH development language, dictionary and all. Into the third slot I can put an EEPROM to save applications to, or theoretically 12kB RAM, as the R65F11 supports up to 16kB outside its 192B. To connect to it, you connect any serial terminal/terminal emulator, no null modem adapter needed. It operates at 1200 baud, 7 bits, no parity, 2 stop bits, hardware flow control. I can set it to 9600 baud from software, but since it's text only it's not really sensible. In total there are eight chips, processor, ROM, RAM, two 74xxxx TTL chips for data latches, and a few little discrete chips. The board is blue and exactly 10cm on each side.

    The part that makes this little box really usable, though, is the manual. It's probably around 200 pages or so, the original copy was typed on a typewriter and then xeroxed, bound with those plastic rings. This thing is just absolutely packed with FORTH theory, low level hardware info on the R65F11, loads of code examples, schematics, troubleshooting, etc. When I get the time I really need to take it apart and scan it all, it's priceless. Without it the RSC-FORTH box would be pretty useless.

    Here's pictures of the case/board (and some video cards I also got from him) - http://picasaweb.google.com/john8520/RSCFORTHVideoCards

    And the front panel after I added the switch and whatnot (dig the labels!) - http://i28.tinypic.com/2z7ik5y.jpg

    And here's a scan (not mine, but I own the document) of an add for it - http://i29.tinypic.com/15z1nyr.jpg

    So far I'm having a lot of fun programming and fiddling with it, it's a seriously cool little computer, definitely the smallest and most powerful, considering its age. Very easy to use, you can program it in two ways too, either program it line by line, or you can create one big (or several big, linked together) named operations. An example of code for each, respectively could be: CR ." HELLO WORLD" . where CR does a charachter return and a line feed, ." tells it to pretty much ignore whatever is input, and save it, and then " tells it to stop ignoring. The . then is the same as the print command in basic. Once you enter that line and hit return it would dump out HELLO WORLDOK because I didn't put a space after world, and OK because after every non-errored line entered it says OK. For a named definition, : HW ( PRINTS HELLO WORD) CR ." HELLO WORLD" . ; would work. The : means start colon definition, the ( ) is for a comment, the rest is the same as before, aside from the ; which ends the colon definition.

    My current plans for it are to bring the parallel header to the front of the case and to get a floppy interface for it. Probably will try to do it over the summer.
Working...
X