Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules and Etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Rule 1: Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Rule 2: Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Rule 3: Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


Rule 4: "PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Rule 5: Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

8087 Upgrade Fail; Fake chip?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    8087 Upgrade Fail; Fake chip?

    My first ever 8087. I received it sealed in an anti-static envelope; seller insists it is new old stock. I don the proper anti-static strap and proceed to plug in the chip. I set the DIP to OFF (Block 1, Switch 2) and my system won't even POST. Does anyone know how I can check if this chip is a fake (without tearing it apart)?

    #2
    Doesn't sound as if you've got a good chip there. I assume that you did the usual checks; making certain that there are no bent pins and that the DIP is oriented correctly in the socket (i.e. not plugged in backwards or offset by a row).
    Reach me: vcfblackhole _at_ protonmail dot com.

    Comment


      #3
      Yea, no bent pins and in the right way. I just pulled out my XT and the same thing, no POST. I used Buy-it-now on eBAY and didn't notice I was buying from Hong Kong until I was paying. Not worth sending back, but I want to see if I can figure out if it is an intentional fraud, or simply a bad chip.

      Comment


        #4
        The HK sellers are variable. Some are outright frauds, selling relabeled chips (I suspect that your 8087 isn't even one under the ceramic--it is a cerdip, not a plastic chip).

        On the other hand, I've had some great experiences with HK sellers.

        You have to be careful.
        Reach me: vcfblackhole _at_ protonmail dot com.

        Comment


          #5
          This one's in service, fully functional and available.


          P2050090.jpg
          PM me if you're looking for 3" or 5" floppy disks. EMail For everything else, Take Another Step

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Stone View Post
            This one's in service, fully functional and available.
            I got a refund so I'm back in the market. I need a 8087-2 because I also have an 8 MHz turbo XT motherboard I want to be able to use it in once in a while.

            Comment


              #7
              I now have a 8087 that lets the system boot. Is there a program I can download that will test and/or exercise the 8087 chip?

              Comment


                #8
                Don't feel too bad about the first chip. A recent report shows that fake chips show up in US military hardware.

                There are probably better tests, but most of the early spreadsheets such as Lotus 1-2-3 could take advantage of the 8087.
                Reach me: vcfblackhole _at_ protonmail dot com.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by mcsew2k View Post
                  Is there a program I can download that will test and/or exercise the 8087 chip?
                  CheckIt Diagnostics will check/test the 8087 maths co-processor.
                  The particular check/test is done during the 'System Board' test within CheckIt.
                  CheckIt refers to the maths co-processor as the "NPU" (numeric processor unit).

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I remember fitting an 8087, and needed it for rendering. You could try a raytracing test with POV Persistance Of Vision, although I don't know if this software is still around. It knocked the rendering time of a picture of fractal generated islands in the sea from 12 hours without the co-processor to about 20mins with it. I remember being bowled over by that!

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by StowComputers View Post
                      although I don't know if this software is still around. It knocked the rendering time of a picture of fractal generated islands in the sea from 12 hours without the co-processor to about 20mins with it. I remember being bowled over by that!
                      POV-RAY is still around, though it's been a while since they provided 16 bit binaries.

                      http://www.povray.org/

                      3.1g was the last version to have official DOS builds.
                      ftp://ftp.povray.org/pub/povray/Old-...l-3.1g/MS-Dos/

                      3.5/later they dropped 16 bit OS support -- but it's matured into a real 3d suite when paired with modeling software like Moray, which is now free as the folks at Pov-Ray put together the means to acquire control of it.

                      Still fun to play with -- especially with 3.5/later supporting multiprocessing so that 20 minutes is down to a few seconds on a i7... though you can still crank the quality and scene complexity up to where some scenes take hours or even days on a modern system -- stuff that would have taken years at 8087 speeds.
                      From time to time the accessibility of a website must be refreshed with the blood of owners and designers. It is its natural manure.
                      CUTCODEDOWN.COM

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by mcsew2k View Post
                        I now have a 8087 that lets the system boot. Is there a program I can download that will test and/or exercise the 8087 chip?
                        I believe this is the Intel test utillity for the 80x87 math coprocessor family.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by modem7 View Post
                          CheckIt Diagnostics will check/test the 8087 maths co-processor.
                          The particular check/test is done during the 'System Board' test within CheckIt.
                          CheckIt refers to the maths co-processor as the "NPU" (numeric processor unit).
                          I had an issue getting CheckIt onto a floppy that would work in the PC. To make a long story short, I was able to put in on a native 720 KB floppy using a DTK controller and it ran and passed my 8087 chip. Thank you for the help.

                          I only have Lotus 123 on catridges for the PCjr, but I know I have Borland QuattroPro. I will do some benchmark testing in the near future.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by mcsew2k View Post
                            I had an issue getting CheckIt onto a floppy that would work in the PC.
                            FWIW, CheckIt goes on two 360K floppies. IIRC, the .ovl goes on the second and the rest on the first.
                            PM me if you're looking for 3" or 5" floppy disks. EMail For everything else, Take Another Step

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by ibmapc View Post
                              [ATTACH]9074[/ATTACH] I believe this is the Intel test utillity for the 80x87 math coprocessor family.
                              Attachment now gone AWOL, at least for me. Can anyone point me to the original? Or PM me if you prefer.

                              Many thanks!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X