Announcement

Collapse

Forum etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


"PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

ISA OPL2 Card

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
    #1

    ISA OPL2 Card

    Hi,

    During some quiet time lately I've got bored enough to make an ISA OPL2 card. It is compatible (and closely follows) the design of the OPL2 card that was popular during late 80's and early 90's. So yes, all games that supported it works with my card too.

    So I am wondering if anyone else is interesting in building such a card?

    I still have two boards left (I ordered the minimal number of 3 boards at oshpark.com... They are US made, pink, and gold plated ). And I will sell them for $20 each (that is the price I paid) plus shipping - $3 in US, $6 anywhere else.

    But if there is enough interest I can place a larger order, in which case boards will be much cheaper... I guess $10 or so.

    More details here:
    http://www.malinov.com/Home/sergeys-.../isa-opl2-card

    Thanks,
    Sergey

    isa_opl2_board.jpgisa_opl2.jpg
    Last edited by sergey; September 25, 2012, 10:16 PM.
    Tags: None
    #2
    Sergey I'm interested!I'm also interested for the IC's (if you have any)

    Comment

      #3
      This seems to be an exact clone of the Adlib Music Synthesizer Card, 1990 revision, in about half the PCB space. There are the exact same number of resistors and capacitors, except the clock divider IC is different. Who has a metal drill to drill clean holes through the bracket?
      My Retro Computing and Vintage Gaming Blog : http://nerdlypleasures.blogspot.com/

      Comment

        #4
        I certainly like the idea and the initiative. The problem I've always had with a OPL2 clone board is you have to cannibalize another device to get the synth chips. Unless you have a non-working original, a cache of Yamaha ICs, or really really like grape-ape solder mask, the target users are limited without adding something 'more'.

        There is an on-going project to accurately map the YM3812 with a shaved IC under a scope. A more full featured sound card with a replacement device might be the next step?


        EDIT: NM, Turns out a log of Asia IC brokers have stock.
        "Good engineers keep thick authoritative books on their shelf. Not for their own reference, but to throw at people who ask stupid questions; hoping a small fragment of knowledge will osmotically transfer with each cranial impact." - Me

        Comment

          #5
          This price is for a bare pcb right?

          Comment

            #6
            That's awesome. If there were enough interest to put together a kit, I would definitely buy one. That would save us all on shipping ICs from China.

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by Great Hierophant View Post
              This seems to be an exact clone of the Adlib Music Synthesizer Card, 1990 revision, in about half the PCB space. There are the exact same number of resistors and capacitors, except the clock divider IC is different. Who has a metal drill to drill clean holes through the bracket?
              As far as I know the 1987 revision was no different (except of PCB layout and 1/4" phone connector instead of 3.5 mm one). I didn't want to reinvent the wheel, and also I wanted to stay as close as possible to the original thing. The 74LS74 is cheaper, smaller and more available than 74LS109 used in the original card, and makes no functional difference.

              I guess regular metal drill will work. But because the bracket is relatively thin, one can start with a small diameter drill, increasing it up to the required diameter. I have to drill my bracket yet, and I'll post the process and the drawing with exact hole positions and sizes.

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by eeguru View Post
                The problem I've always had with a OPL2 clone board is you have to cannibalize another device to get the synth chips.
                Actually they are available on eBay, and also here:
                http://www.arcadecomponents.com/cpusupport.html

                Comment

                  #9
                  Originally posted by lucasdaytona View Post
                  This price is for a bare pcb right?
                  Yes that is for the PCB only. Other components are about $25 (brand new from Mouser, probably you can get cheaper from other sources), and $6 + shipping for OPL2 and DAC on eBay. See the linked page for the complete BOM.

                  Comment

                    #10
                    The problem I have with both ebay and those recyclers are where did they get the chips? Unfortunately from destroyed boards. And it's demand that feeds their business and a replacement OPL2 card feeds demand.

                    I would rather group buy from a broker's overstock. But market's tend to work themselves out. I just personally hate it when I see 'working pull' in an eBay auction.
                    "Good engineers keep thick authoritative books on their shelf. Not for their own reference, but to throw at people who ask stupid questions; hoping a small fragment of knowledge will osmotically transfer with each cranial impact." - Me

                    Comment

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Hatta View Post
                      That's awesome. If there were enough interest to put together a kit, I would definitely buy one. That would save us all on shipping ICs from China.

                      I don't have any plans to do kits (too much overhead), but I can do PCBs. If you're interested in making kits, I can provide some guidance regarding ordering PCBs, or provide you PCBs for the manufacturing price + shipping.
                      Most of the components can be ordered from multiple distributors, and I have a BOM on my page for everything from Mouser except of OPL2/DAC, which can be purchased from China... shipping is not expensive $4 or so...

                      Comment

                        #12
                        Originally posted by sergey View Post
                        As far as I know the 1987 revision was no different (except of PCB layout and 1/4" phone connector instead of 3.5 mm one). I didn't want to reinvent the wheel, and also I wanted to stay as close as possible to the original thing. The 74LS74 is cheaper, smaller and more available than 74LS109 used in the original card, and makes no functional difference.

                        I guess regular metal drill will work. But because the bracket is relatively thin, one can start with a small diameter drill, increasing it up to the required diameter. I have to drill my bracket yet, and I'll post the process and the drawing with exact hole positions and sizes.
                        While I could not swear that the resistor values are exactly the same in the 1987 and 1990 boards, the latter has two more decoupling capacitors than the former. http://www.wavetable.nl/?p=62
                        My Retro Computing and Vintage Gaming Blog : http://nerdlypleasures.blogspot.com/

                        Comment

                          #13
                          Sergey, not to hijaak your thread at all, but you folks that are interested in this board, Andrew Lynch and Per have had an OPL2 card on the burner for a test run for quite awhile. Though it appears that Sergey has done the build/test phase himself, and successfully.

                          Anyways - Lynch's thread is here. Layout of the PCB is here.
                          Last edited by Maverick1978; September 26, 2012, 06:30 PM.
                          ---
                          Currently seeking:
                          * Roland MPU-401/AT (with daughter card header)
                          * Magitronic K-156 Keyboard (5pin DIN w/ XT-AT switch)
                          I also collect PC and C64 Sierra On-Line software!

                          Comment

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Maverick1978 View Post
                            Sergey, not to hijaak your thread at all, but you folks that are interested in this board, Andrew Lynch and Per have had an OPL2 card on the burner for a test run for quite awhile. Though it appears that Sergey has done the build/test phase himself, and successfully.

                            Anyways - Lynch's thread is here. Layout of the PCB is here.
                            The only problem with that project is that the amplifiers are as bare bones as it gets. After looking at it for a while, I see that the project should have the following improvements:

                            1. A pair of proper Op-Amp buffers on the outputs from the stereo splitter.
                            2. A jumper that routed the ToBuffer output directly to the output amplifiers rather than through the stereo splitter (and of course corresponding jumpers to disconnect the outputs from the stereo splitter).
                            3. Proper filters and power-amplifiers for a solid output. Right now there's just a single pair of power-amplifiers tied directly to the outputs of the stereo splitter.

                            But besides that, it should be just fine. I don't think stereo-split mono is really any problem at all, but why have half the sample-rate when full quality output can be acheived by using the unsplit mono output. If anyone wonders why there is a Stereo DAC on an OPL2 board at all (as the OPL2 is mono), that's because the board also has support for the OPM and it's derivatives (OPP/OPZ/OPZII).
                            Last edited by per; September 27, 2012, 07:03 AM.
                            Current systems owned by me:
                            Vintage:IBM PC/XT submodel 087 ( 1983 ), [Kon]tiki-100 rev. C (1983), Compaq Portable I ( 1984 ), IBM PC/XT submodel 078 ( 1985 ), IBM PC/XT286 ( ~1986 ), 3x Nintendo Entertainement Systems ( 1987 ).
                            Obsolete:Commodore A500 ( ~1990 ), IBM PS/2 model 70/386 type 8570-161 ( 1991 ), Atari Lynx II ( ~1992 ), Generic Intel 486SX PC ( ~1993 ), AT/T Globalyst Pentium w/FDIV bug MB ( 1994 ), Compaq 486DX4 laptop ( ~1995 ).

                            Comment

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Maverick1978 View Post
                              Andrew Lynch and Per have had an OPL2 card on the burner for a test run for quite awhile.
                              Yes, I am aware of that project. I prefer a more minimalistic approach of Adlib (OPL2 only with mono DAC-SS), and a smaller board. Anyway most of software (read - games) support just that. And I am also too cheap (or not a vintage collector enough) to spend ~$200 on the original thing.

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                              Working...
                              X