Announcement

Collapse

Forum etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


"PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

IBM PC 5150 and IBM PC XT 5160 FAQ

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Airxx
    replied
    I have a question on the U28 socket on the BIOS row. What goes there and if the socket is damaged will the board function properly? I acquired a 5150 chassis w/ motherboard and it was in poor shape (looked like it had been buried in dust and filth) and this socket was rather mangled. I have hopes of cleaning it up and getting the board back into action one day, but this damage was the first obvious issue aside from the dirt.

    Everything I have seen indicates it remains empty, but I was looking for validation. The board is a 64-256k type. Too much grime on the board to read much else. Figured I'd ask before expending a lot of effort should repairs be beyond hope.

    Leave a comment:


  • ropersonline
    replied
    Originally posted by itsvince725 View Post
    2. Is this a serial number sticker or is it just nothing? I was trying to find something aside from "copyright 1985" to tell me when my XT 286 was built and this sticker is the only thing I found.

    https://i.imgur.com/ecGJZgx.jpg
    The 5162 part is the model number for that 286 XT. The seven-digit part looks like a serial – I think. I don't think the 83 part is the year, because that model only came out in 86. I'm unsure about the 72 part.

    Leave a comment:


  • ropersonline
    replied
    Originally posted by haglebu View Post
    In my IBM PC 5150 (64-256K) this hole is used for the power supply for the exernal 3.5" floppy drive (IBM 4865).

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]51284[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]51285[/ATTACH]
    Wow, that's really interesting, because I've never known what that hole was really for. Was it explicitly for precisely this, or was it a general hole for any and all cables that perhaps needed sneaking out of the case? Can you show us the other side of that? Like, what does the cable connect to on the inside?

    Leave a comment:


  • ropersonline
    replied
    This may be somewhat off-topic or at least meta, but this sticky thread, along with a bunch of other threads on vcf, contains a number of old Photobucket links. They're nearly non-functional now, and that's incredibly annoying, in that you can almost but not quite access those old images and read what it said in those old brochures.

    That's because of shenanigans and shittiness from both Photobucket and the W3C and Mozilla/Firefox and other browser-makers.

    Photobucket has pulled a bait and switch, which, however common on the web these days, is really deceptive and should properly be illegal on a federal or international level. Like Lord Vader in The Empire Strikes Back, they have retroactively altered the deal, and now you can't really access the images properly anymore, which makes even Photobucket's slogan of "host. store. share." outright trollish, because they've making the sharing of their images as hard as humanly possible.

    When I visit any of the above links, the images are technically loaded, but they're not loaded or rendered as the direct links they pretend to be, but instead presented embedded in a html page (with ads unless I block them) at a reduced resolution.
    Normally, I, the owner of this computer, and being in control of the browser on MY computer, normally I would just right-click on any image and view it alone and full-size, and zoom it to whatever is comfortable for my ageing eyes.

    Ah, but not anymore:
    You see, Mozilla/Firefox and the W3C have fallen prey to corporate entryism.

    <rant>
    Mozilla/Firefox have increasingly and incrementally removed browser features that put the user in the driving seat, and added features that make it easy for remote corporations to fight users for control. (If this phrasing sounds familiar, that's because I've recently said similar things in another context here.
    It used to be that you could view the source, and it would tell you exactly what's currently there on a source level. Not anymore. When you now click view source in Firefox, it re-fetches the source, i.e. it doesn't actually show you the source of exactly what you're NOW looking at, it just shows you whatever the remote corporation would deign to show you on the repeat attempt. And that might be different. In the same vein, older versions of Adblock Plus on older versions of Firefox used to show you a list of all the resources currently in play, but no longer.
    And Firefox used to have a fairly straightforward cache, but a lot of the content and cookies have now increasingly been squirrelled away in databases that complicate access for mere mortals, and mere mortals often can't even get browser add-ons anymore that would put that power under their fingertips, because add-ons are now a walled garden, where curiously the really user-empowering stuff simply doesn't get "approved", and then they've rammed signing down everyone's throat too, so it's a real pain to even run "unapproved" code.
    Plus, partial downloads now often get deleted instantly, as does everything Firefox still puts in /tmp, to make absolutely sure you the owner and user of the computer are no longer in the driving seat. (You often can't even retry downloads that fail for any reason.)

    Meanwhile, the W3C has changed the standards, to make it easy for remote corporations to come up with ever-shape-shifting tags that try and defy classification and filtering by the user, but they've approved plenty of changes that give remote corporations a lot of control over what goes on even when the user doesn't want that. We used to call that sort of conduct spyware, adware, malware, or trojan-like behaviour, but now since it's a website and you're voluntarily visiting the website, apparently that's okay. Adware authors back in the day made the exact same excuse: They were justified in doing whatever, because you were using their program, after all.

    </rant>

    Photobucket have fully exploited everything the browser-makers and the W3C have handed them, and they've now made it so that if I try to right-click and save those images, that only saves the HTML of the embed-page.
    Oh, and "meta http-equiv='Cache-Control' content='no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate'? Why thank you, W3C and Mozilla! We wouldn't want the user to be able to decide or override anything that goes on on their own PC.
    If I try to drag and drop the loaded image to a folder on my computer, Firefox reloads the image before copying it, (literally wasting user bandwidth just to make sure remote corporations are still in full control), and Photobucket then serves up a destructively watermarked mess on the second attempt, trollishly and ironically marked with the aforementioned slogan of "host. store. share." Yes, "share." As if.
    The only ways to still view the image at full resolution seem to be:
    • to manually really dig deep into the browser cache (where yes, I've been able to find the current full-resolution copy), or
    • to be the owner of the Photobucket account, but from what multiple googleable posts tell me, Photobucket even makes it hard for those owners to download their own images in bulk, or
    • to search the usual places for more-accessible (cached) copies while praying real hard.


    Thus:

    tl;dr: Is there any interest here at vcf in removing and replacing all the photobucket links from these forums, at least where copies of those images even still exist?
    (I'm thinking, if the links are fully dead then leave them for the record, but otherwise, perhaps substitute image sources that work, like this site's own?)
    I suppose it might be quite the job to do so, and it would require hosting the images here at the forums, because even imgur is starting to pull a bait-and-switch where direct jpg links often redirect to ad-ridden pages that already break normal usability, and presumably that will only get worse.
    I know this might be a pain in the neck to deal with, but perhaps it's a good idea to rescue those images before they're fully gone?
    Shouldn't at least the image links in these sticky threads be replaced by ones that fully work?
    What do people think?

    PS: And btw., I don't suppose anyone knows an image host that isn't bait-and-switch and doesn't suck? I suppose that's not sustainable? Probably the bait and switch was part of the plan for all of the "free host" places all along? It makes a user feel like one of wild animals starring in Shawn Woods' Mousetrap Monday, where first he feeds them, and then he, ahem, features them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Culbrelai
    replied
    Quick question, i have a 5160, how do I find its serial number? There’s a sticker on the back that says S/N 51013305160, but what is its actual production run number like #100000 like ive seen others post?

    Leave a comment:


  • haglebu
    replied
    In my IBM PC 5150 (64-256K) this hole is used for the power supply for the exernal 3.5" floppy drive (IBM 4865).

    IMG_8830.jpg IMG_8831.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • mR_Slug
    replied
    Here is probably the best place to sell your old computers. I'm interested in a 5150. Probably the best thing to do is make a post in the For-Sale-or-Trade section. Pictures would help a lot.

    Leave a comment:


  • jshamel
    replied
    I just found a lot of old computers and cards in the garage that are in great condition. Among this find is an IBM 5150. I plan to sell the things that I have. The question is where is the best place to do so? Should I use ebay or should I find buyers some other way. I also have some pretty old hard drives ( Seagate ST-151 among them ). Thanks in advance for the advice.

    Leave a comment:


  • itsvince725
    replied
    I figured this would be a good place to ask this...I have two questions.

    1. What size are the case screws that hold the top and bottom cases together? My XT 286 didn't come with any and it's kinda hard to pick up as a result...

    2. Is this a serial number sticker or is it just nothing? I was trying to find something aside from "copyright 1985" to tell me when my XT 286 was built and this sticker is the only thing I found.

    https://i.imgur.com/ecGJZgx.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • Stone
    replied
    Adding a 74LS158N to U84 and soldering a wire to jumper pad E2 allows you to put 640k in what previously was a 64-256k board.

    Leave a comment:


  • romanon
    replied
    I want to know something about late XT motherboards, which was redesigned from 64-256k to 256-640k. I saw some MBs which has sticker on "64-256k" and there was "256-640k" written like here:

    IBM 5160 Motherboard.jpg

    Also circuit 74LS158N was added to socket U84
    It can be assumed, that IBM recycles their older motherboards to produce 256-640k boards, or it is clearly custom made?

    I have also such a motherboard, mine sticker is actually writen by hand...

    256640.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • Great Hierophant
    replied
    I use that hole in the 5150 to snake out cables.

    Leave a comment:


  • Casey
    replied
    I always thought it was a blank to mount an extra serial or parallel port. Later tower designs included pre-cut blanks you could punch out for a db9 or db25 connector.

    Leave a comment:


  • romanon
    replied
    Originally posted by modem7 View Post
    I am pretty sure that the question has been asked on this forum before. One of the suggestions was that IBM may have been allowing for a possible future use where all slots are populated (i.e. no slot blanking panels), and a cable needs to be run from inside the case to outside the case.
    So place here battery pack in XT-286 was great idea. At least some...

    I suppose, that for same purpose is whole on IBM 5150

    5150_later_case_rear_barcode1 (1).jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • modem7
    replied
    Originally posted by romanon View Post
    Whats the purpose of this hole?
    I am pretty sure that the question has been asked on this forum before. One of the suggestions was that IBM may have been allowing for a possible future use where all slots are populated (i.e. no slot blanking panels), and a cable needs to be run from inside the case to outside the case.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X