Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules and Etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Rule 1: Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Rule 2: Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Rule 3: Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


Rule 4: "PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Rule 5: Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

programs that use the 8087

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    programs that use the 8087

    Anyone know of any games or programs that use the 8087 co-processor besides Lotus 123 and auto cad?
    IBM und Texas über alles
    Lebe dein leben für dich selbst

    #2
    I believe the original version of MATLAB, which floats around on the Internet, would use a coprocessor if available (otherwise use software emulation).

    For those of you unfortunate enough to use it in your daily lives (like myself), as you might expect, the original MATLAB is something of a novelty on a modern computer compared to the product it is today, and is not compatible with scripts written on MathWorks versions.
    Looking for: Needham's Electronics PB-10 Microcontroller Adapter (looking for one since early 2012!).

    Comment


      #3
      Apparently, SimCity (original) does. I haven't done any speed comparisons though.
      Twitter / YouTube

      Comment


        #4
        MS Windows supported the 8087 and would pass calls through the dll emulator to the physical coprocessor. Admittedly, that was just there for Excel support but I think some of the drawing programs also used it. Not many though.

        An old FAQ file done by Norbert Joffa lists some programs benefitting from a coprocessor though I believe a few of these require a 286 or better for the processor:
        - CAD programs (AutoCAD, VersaCAD, GenericCAD)
        - Spreadsheet programs (Lotus 1-2-3, Excel, Quattro, Wingz)
        - Business graphics programs (Arts&Letters, Freedom of Press, Freelance)
        - Mathematical analysis and statistical programs (Mathematica, TKSolver,
        SPSS/PC, Statgraphics)
        - Database programs (dBase IV, FoxBase, Paradox, Revelation)

        Mostly software that used the 8087 were scientific academic programs often written in Fortran. Not exactly exciting but it is out there.

        Oh, here is a Mandelbrot program that requires coprocessor http://www.bmeijer.com/software/mand...tal/index.html I hope this is related to one I remember that ran on an 8086 plus 8087. Also, maybe you can find a program called AVGAFRAK which supposedly was run on 8087

        I don't know of a single game that benefitted from the X87. Even software that did complex scaling tended to use brute force integer approximations to avoid the whole issue of numeric coprocessors up until the mid-90s or so.

        Comment


          #5
          There is an astronomy program called 'LodeStar' from Zephyr Services that used the 8087 to good advantage. LodeStar is a night sky type planetarium program that can calculate and plot a sky view, looking in any direction, for any date. I originally used the program as an observing tool with my telescope, and finally bought an 8087 ($100+) for my PC to speed up the results. The difference in performance was fantastic. Attached is a description listing. I still occasionally use this astronomy calculator program!

          LodeStar.jpg

          Comment


            #6
            FRACTINT will use a math coprocessor for anything other than a mandelbrot (and there are hundreds). And yes, the DOS version still runs on 8088.
            Offering a bounty for:
            - A working Sanyo MBC-775 or Logabax 1600
            - Music Construction Set, IBM Music Feature edition (has red sticker on front stating IBM Music Feature)

            Comment


              #7
              IBM FORTRAN. The co-pro was a pre-req.

              Comment


                #8
                Also required for IBM PC APL 1.0.

                Comment


                  #9
                  I am going to have to try some of these, I have never even so much as tested my 8087 to see if it's real...
                  IBM und Texas über alles
                  Lebe dein leben für dich selbst

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by josephdaniel View Post
                    I have never even so much as tested my 8087 to see if it's real...
                    CheckIt Diagnostics software will check/test the 8087 maths co-processor.
                    The particular check/test is done during the 'System Board' test within CheckIt.
                    CheckIt refers to the maths co-processor as the "NPU" (numeric processor unit).

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Microsoft's QuickBASIC 4.5 uses the 8087. I recall installing it on hard disk of a machine with an 8087 and later moving that hard disk to another IBM PC. It took some head scratching to figure out why other programs ran, but not QB45. Plugging in an 8087 solved the problem. So did re-installing without the NPU.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by mmruzek View Post
                        There is an astronomy program called 'LodeStar' from Zephyr Services that used the 8087 to good advantage. LodeStar is a night sky type planetarium program that can calculate and plot a sky view, looking in any direction, for any date. I originally used the program as an observing tool with my telescope, and finally bought an 8087 ($100+) for my PC to speed up the results. The difference in performance was fantastic. Attached is a description listing. I still occasionally use this astronomy calculator program!

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]14443[/ATTACH]
                        Wait, you spent $100 on an 8087?
                        This space intentionally left blank [ ].

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by arrow_runner View Post
                          Wait, you spent $100 on an 8087?
                          I'll bet that was a loooong time ago. Whaddya' think 8087s cost 15 or 20 years ago?
                          PM me if you're looking for 3½" or 5¼" floppy disks. EMail “ ” For everything else, Take Another Step

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by arrow_runner View Post
                            Wait, you spent $100 on an 8087?
                            If I recall correctly, I spent $139 plus shipping. And on top of it, I bent a pin when I installed the IC in the socket and it didn't work the first try. It seemed like magic when I finally got it working with the astronomy program.
                            Attached Files

                            Comment


                              #15
                              It never crossed my mind that you bought this new... still very cool. The pricing on these looked screwy, I also didn't know that 8087-1 = 10MHz, 2 = 8Mhz, 3 = 4MHz.
                              This space intentionally left blank [ ].

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X