Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules and Etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Rule 1: Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Rule 2: Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Rule 3: Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


Rule 4: "PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Rule 5: Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

Challenger Computer, inc, XT-186

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Challenger Computer, inc, XT-186

    Saw a couple of threads on '186 based systems and thought I'd share this.
    10 Mhz 80186, 640k. It's been many years since I fired it up, but I remember it acting as a typical 'turbo' XT clone. Pretty sure I never tried any 16-bit cards in the lower two isa slots, wouldn't count on them being actually 16-bit isa compatible.


    cci-xt-186.jpg
    cci-xt-186-cpu.jpg

    #2
    Nice.
    Thomas Byers (DRI)- "You'll have a million people using the A> [MS-DOS prompt] forever. You'll have five million using [nongraphic] menu systems such as Topview, Concurrent PC-DOS, Desq, and those types. But there'll be 50 to 100 million using the iconic-based interfaces."

    Comment


      #3
      No lid over the CLCC 80186?
      Reach me: vcfblackhole _at_ protonmail dot com.

      Comment


        #4
        The lid is on in the first pic. Checking it over for date codes, it looks like it was made in early 1986, two years after the IBM AT introduction.So those bottom two slots most likely would have been made to take an isa standard 16-bit card, but how useful could that have been with only one interrupt controller and one dma controller?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Chuck(G) View Post
          No lid over the CLCC 80186?
          Look at the first picture. Looks like he took it off to snap a closeup for the second pic.

          Comment


            #6
            I'm really curious about this board because of those 16-bit slots. Obviously they couldn't be fully AT compatible since the 80186 can't address above 1MB or do 16-bit DMA, but maybe the designer of this board tried to make slots that were partially compatible. It might be worth checking with a multimeter to see where things go. If everything lines up, it might be worth trying a few 16-bit cards in there to see what happens. It would be pretty neat for example if certain memory cards and VGA cards could benefit from the extra bandwidth of those slots.
            "Will the Highways on the internets become more few?"

            V'Ger XT

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Anonymous Coward View Post
              I'm really curious about this board because of those 16-bit slots. Obviously they couldn't be fully AT compatible since the 80186 can't address above 1MB or do 16-bit DMA
              Well, most 286 systems only ever ran in real mode, and had 1 MB or less of memory, so I don't see how that would be much of a limitation for the 186 system.
              I suppose you could add two 8259 DMA controllers on the board if you wanted 16-bit DMA functionality that is fully AT-compatible.
              Sadly the pictures aren't clear enough to see just what peripheral chips there are on the board aside from the 186 itself, but there apparently are several large DIPs there.
              Even so, 16-bit DMA was rarely used. Mainly by 16-bit sound cards, but those would have arrived years later. Besides, most of them are also backward-compatible with 8088-systems and can work with 8-bit DMA only.
              http://scalibq.wordpress.com/just-ke...o-programming/

              Comment


                #8
                There were also some HDCs (SCSI and perhaps ESDI) that used 16-bit DMA.
                Reach me: vcfblackhole _at_ protonmail dot com.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Chuck(G) View Post
                  There were also some HDCs (SCSI and perhaps ESDI) that used 16-bit DMA.
                  There were? As far as I know, HDCs didn't use the onboard DMA because performance was far worse than CPU polling (the DMA controllers only ran at 3 or 4 MHz depending on the CPU speed).
                  I do know that some high-end HDCs had their own (fast) DMA controller on the ISA card. But that should work fine on any motherboard, regardless of the type of DMA they have onboard.
                  http://scalibq.wordpress.com/just-ke...o-programming/

                  Comment


                    #10
                    There were. I'm not certain if it was legacy 8237-type DMA or bus-mastering, however. I think I even have a QIC tape controller that uses 16-bit 8237 DMA.
                    Reach me: vcfblackhole _at_ protonmail dot com.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Interesting. I was under the impression that a ‘186/‘188 system couldn’t be 100% IBM compatible because the integrated IO weren’t the same parts that IBM used. Does that thing run big standard DOS or is it custom?

                      Comment


                        #12
                        I think when I had trs-80 color3 computer I own a 80186 computer I bought it from Radio Shack it was used but it was short lived for me. I know my brother had an 8088 at the same time. That about all I can say about it.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Jmdlcar View Post
                          I think when I had trs-80 color3 computer I own a 80186 computer I bought it from Radio Shack it was used but it was short lived for me. I know my brother had an 8088 at the same time. That about all I can say about it.
                          Having an 8088 doesn't equate to pc compatibility. Having an 80188/80186 doesn't prevent. A designer can opt to ignore the onboard peripherals and build a vanilla style mobo with associated support chips. This may nor may not be the system board sold by a company in California that was touted as fully compatible. It' mobo was made in the US.

                          I pm'ed the op asking for detailed photos and firmware dumps. He hasn't replied yet

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I'll try to get the roms dumped and pics tonight.

                            The date codes on the chips point to it being made in early '86, two years after the IBM AT. Only has 1 interrupt controller and 1 dma controller. A quick look over the traces for the 16-bit slot makes me think they might be "compatible" for certain values of compatible. It looks like the dma channels on the 16-bit isa extension go to jumpers that let you map them to the lower dma channels. I'll have to fire it up with a 16-bit video card and see what I get.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Here's the roms, a pair of Mitsubishi M5L2764K.
                              Attached Files

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X