Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules and Etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Rule 1: Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Rule 2: Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Rule 3: Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


Rule 4: "PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Rule 5: Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

Original-IBM-5150 or IBM-Clone Memory Experimentation Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • T-Squared
    replied
    I'm curious to know one thing, did any XT/AT clones have PLAs installed?

    The reason why I ask is because IBM had PLAs in their systems, but most of what I see on my Sanyo's CPU/Memory board is logic ICs.

    Leave a comment:


  • T-Squared
    replied
    The mask repair paint is still on the way, as well as an ultraviolet flashlight to cure the paint when finished.

    I also did a bit of snooping around on minuszerodegrees, and found this: http://www.minuszerodegrees.net/5160..._revisions.htm

    If I had to guess, given what I've seen in my Sanyo, and what I've discussed with this forum, my system is closer to an IBM 5160 than a 5150 or 5170. There's only one set of 8 DIP switches, as described on the MZD page about the 5160, and the document in the page above describes the EXACT modification that I'm attempting to do. (Although I have to look closer at the document to see how similar it is to my system, barring component numberings)
    Last edited by T-Squared; October 26, 2020, 07:09 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • T-Squared
    replied
    I did it. 3 days of work.

    20201022_191049.jpg

    My neck hurts, my hand hurts. :P

    There's some negligible damage, but ONLY to the solder mask. I have some mask-repair paint on the way to touch up some of the surface.

    I had to use two soldering irons at times, plus a micro drill bit (i.e. 0.4mm) for the more-stubborn holes. (mostly those connected to a ground or A8 [address line 8] plane, that would wick up the heat.)

    I made sure not to keep the iron on the holes too long, and I checked that the copper inside and on the surface were flush with the board. (to make sure that the epoxy holding them did not loosen)

    I didn't touch the 9th row of memory footprints. I'm not sure what use parity memory has in this case. I know what it's for, I just don't see any real use for it, unless it adds more integrity for memory contention. (I could add something later, since I stated earlier that this sister board has a space for a parity generator chip.)

    Leave a comment:


  • maxtherabbit
    replied
    4164s aren't that common, you should really learn proper technique with the vacuum desoldering tool. Reflowing the joints first with fresh solder is a big thing

    Leave a comment:


  • T-Squared
    replied
    Now it starts... (I've also soldered in the socket for the LS158.)


    20201019_163548.jpg
    20201019_170327.jpg
    20201019_170339.jpg

    I had considered using my vacuum desoldering pump, but it didn't give me the results I was looking for, so I decided to clip the memory off, and melt the solder while pulling the pins out. (It's not easy... 512 pins to pull, THEN melt-and-suck clean!) Some may complain that I'm wasting perfectly good memory. I think it's better this way. Memory chips are more common. MBC-775s are not. 😜

    Leave a comment:


  • T-Squared
    replied
    Ok, after a good night's rest, I looked the pair of processor/memory boards over again and found that they are actually different in terms of bodge wiring. (They have two wires, but they are connected to different components)

    The trace from Pin 1 of the S158 footprint, and the other two S158s, is attached to a buffer delay line chip on the far side of the board.

    All of the pin 1's are also connected to the VCC of a S138 Multiplexer.

    (You don't need to reply if you don't want to, I'm just thinking out loud here. I'll take a look at those technical schematics.)

    Update: At first glance, I may only have to plunk in a new S158 chip! (Again, this is ONLY at first glance.) The delay line seems to already be connected in its proper spot, according to that 5160 schematic.

    Update: There also seems to be a spot for an S280 chip, which is a parity generator. It makes sense, because in each bank, there are actually 9 footprints for memory chips, with one unpopulated.

    Update: There's also a footprint for an S139 multiplexer. Going by what I see, in proximity to the memory, this is probably a parity multiplexer.
    Last edited by T-Squared; October 17, 2020, 09:54 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eudimorphodon
    replied
    I would definitely recommend not pulling off random wires without knowing what they do. If you’re serious about making this work you need to start documenting the circuitry as it is *now* and understand how it works.

    Remember, there’s actually two nearly separate elements in play here. First is enabling that multiplexing circuitry so the machine is physically capable of driving the denser chips. Secondly you’ll need to figure out the *decode* circuit that controls when a given bank of chips is active. If you don’t then the computer will still “think” all the chips exist within the same bottom 256k of the address space and the changes to the multiplexing won’t matter.

    Leave a comment:


  • T-Squared
    replied
    This may be just as simple as removing the wires and soldering in the components. (I'm not assuming anything yet, and won't remove anything without being sure of it, though.)

    I already have a socket to put in the footprint, and I have an S158 from Mouser on its way. (As well as some ceramic capacitors to see if I can fix the waviness caused by electrical interference from the quieter power supply fan I put in; The old one was very noisy, sound-wise.)
    Last edited by T-Squared; October 16, 2020, 08:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eudimorphodon
    replied
    Originally posted by T-Squared View Post
    Indeed, on the Sanyo motherboard there are solder points on that LS158 footprint connected to the CPU. However, the continuity between the A16 and A17 address pins and the footprint points are in the MegaOhm range.
    It's unlikely that A16 and A17 needed by that missing multiplexer go *directly* to the CPU. In a typical XT the 8088 sits behind a number of buffers and latches to deal with the fact that Intel used multiplexing to keep the chip package down to 40 pins. The address lines are usually terminated on 74373 or 74573 latches, and it's possible at least there's another buffer/driver chip south of those, like a 74244.

    Leave a comment:


  • T-Squared
    replied
    Indeed, on the Sanyo motherboard there are solder points on that LS158 footprint connected to the CPU. However, the continuity between the A16 and A17 address pins and the footprint points are in the MegaOhm range.

    There is also a bodge wire on the back of both Sanyo processor/memory motherboards connecting the "A/B Select" Pin (Pin 1) to another solder point on the board. (I was able to clear the other solder vias on the LS158 footprint with very little problem, but I've left the solder point with the bodge wire alone until I know what to do with it.)

    There are significant differences between the amount of bodge wiring between the two, but the fact that a wire is connected there seems constant.
    Last edited by T-Squared; October 16, 2020, 05:09 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eudimorphodon
    replied
    Originally posted by T-Squared View Post
    Actually, I think both you and I may have been correct. There are indeed two S158-type chips on the motherboard, right next to the memory. (They're on the lower left of the picture below) They're 74S158 (Note: I did NOT say LS, as you said, but I think the L doesn't matter.)
    The "L" just means low power, they're both TTL chips and most flavors of TTL are electrically compatible. (An "S" is faster than an "LS", but not as fast as an "F".)

    Even better, there is a space for a THIRD S158 Chip, just as you described! Although there is what seems to be a pull-up resistor in the path of the #1 pins, I'll test the soldering points tonight to see if Pin 1 of any of the memory connects to any pins on that S158 footprint, and then see if any of the S158's vias go to the CPU.
    Okay, so that *is* definitely a good sign that Sanyo anticipated the possibility that they'd want to make a version of the board that would support 256kbit chips. I'd recommend using the 5160's schematics as a guide and trace out to see how much the Sanyo resembles it. You may indeed be able to populate that chip and (probably) make a couple other minor component changes to enable upgrading to 640k.

    (One thing to be clear on: Even if the motherboard can support the chips you can't just slap in a full 1MB and use all of it. Depending on what circuitry the machine uses to decode its memory you're probably going to only be able to use 640k, IE, replace two banks of RAM and keep 64k chips in the other. There is an expansion hack out there for 5160s that lets you replace all the chips with 256kbit ones and use *some* of the extra RAM as upper memory blocks, but that requires replacing a decoder PROM with an appropriately programmed one. The Sanyo *may* use a similar PROM, or it may use some other method. You're not going to get 384k of "Expanded Memory", "Expanded Memory" is a specific kind of bank-switched RAM that requires mapping hardware that motherboard *definitely* will not have.)

    Leave a comment:


  • T-Squared
    replied
    Actually, I think both you and I may have been correct. There are indeed two S158-type chips on the motherboard, right next to the memory. (They're on the lower left of the picture below) They're 74S158 (Note: I did NOT say LS, as you said, but I think the L doesn't matter.)

    Even better, there is a space for a THIRD S158 Chip, just as you described! Although there is what seems to be a pull-up resistor in the path of the #1 pins, I'll test the soldering points tonight to see if Pin 1 of any of the memory connects to any pins on that S158 footprint, and then see if any of the S158's vias go to the CPU.

    20201016_162256.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • Eudimorphodon
    replied
    Originally posted by T-Squared View Post
    I'm getting 4.75 KOhms for resistance measurement from pin #1 (probably because the continuity is passing through a component), and no continuity beeps when I probe that pin and ground together.

    This is looking more hopeful at each step!
    You need to physically eyeball where those traces are going. They could just be connected to a pull up. (Although being connected to a pull-up would at least imply that Sanyo anticipated they *might* want to allow 256kb chips to work in the board someday.) Here is the technical reference manual for an IBM 5150. There's a somewhat oversimplified diagram of how the RAM interface works on page 1-7; follow the arrow from the RAM chips backward and you'll find one goes to a pair of 74LS158 multiplexers. For the Sanyo to be able to do something with a 256kb RAM that trace from A9 (pin1) on the DRAM chips will need to terminate on something like that.

    Here's the manual for the IBM 5160, the later version of which supported 256k chips. Contrast its memory circuitry on page 1-52 with page 1-42 of the 5150 manual. They're mostly similar, in that both have a pair of 74LS158s handling address pins A0-A15 from the CPU and converting them to A0-A7 on the memory chips. The critical difference on the 5160: pin 1, A8, of the DRAM sockets goes to its own 74LS158 which sits on A16 and A17 from the CPU. If the Sanyo is going to support 256k chips it's going to need that trace to go to the equivalent circuitry. Which might not necessarily be the same, it could even be inside of a PAL chip, but, yeah.

    Leave a comment:


  • T-Squared
    replied
    I'm getting 4.75 KOhms for resistance measurement from pin #1 (probably because the continuity is passing through a component), and no continuity beeps when I probe that pin and ground together.

    This is looking more hopeful at each step!

    Leave a comment:


  • Eudimorphodon
    replied
    Originally posted by T-Squared View Post
    Well, looking at the motherboard, it at least suggests that Pin #1 of the 4164s are connected to something, because each one has a trace coming off of them, which is NC on the pinout, so I'm guessing there's more to this.
    Trace it. NC pins are often connected to ground. If it goes to something that's not ground then maybe you have a hope.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X