Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules and Etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Rule 1: Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Rule 2: Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Rule 3: Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


Rule 4: "PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Rule 5: Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

Dual pentium pro, HORRIBLE performance, can't figure out why.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Dual pentium pro, HORRIBLE performance, can't figure out why.

    short story: irregardless of what I do, I cant get my dual p-pro system to work at an acceptable speed. Benchmarks @ 2.5 with memory throughput @ ~28mb/s. Regular Pentium comes in @ 147 and 70mb/s.

    Long story: I just got in the voodoo 1 card for my "gaming" dual Pentium pro system and in attempting to install NT 4.0, I noticed it was taking FOREVER. I stopped it after EIGHT hours. I decide to run some benchmarks to see what was going on. Here is the "ideal" setup that I was shooting for:

    Asus p65up5 motherboard with c-p6nd cpu card. (REV 1.41 and 1.2 respectfully)
    512mb edo ram (8 sticks)
    2x Pentium pro overdrives @ 333mhz
    matrox G200 video card
    voodoo 1 6mb
    awe64 sound
    3com 509b
    IDE raid card LSI series 511

    Naturally I pull everything to the bare essentials, and it still made no difference. re-setting the bios did nothing, nor did setting up the bios for "maximum speed". So I run some benchmarks too see whats going on, and this is the result:
    http://i.imgur.com/fG51is.jpg
    And for comparison, here is how my 386dx40 does.
    http://i.imgur.com/5EfT7.jpg

    changing video cards made no difference. Changing the ram made no difference. (tried 5 sets)
    I change the processors to 200/1m's
    http://i.imgur.com/tzwrm.jpg
    Then to 200/256k's
    http://i.imgur.com/rG4D7.jpg

    So I test another board. This time its a dual socket 7 with a pair of 200's and 512kb of total cache. Same video card, same ram.
    http://i.imgur.com/dlML8.jpg
    You can see in the bottom right graph the cache working exactly as it should, a LOT different than the other board. Also, i know full well it says failed on the extended memory test, But that's a concern for a later day, as this board did this with EVERY set of ram that I have. (I'm running mem test right now to be sure, I THINK it has a bad socket)

    I test a 3rd board, this time its a DIFFERENT p65up5. Its a rev 1.2/1.1 setup. it was NOT compatible with my 1mb chips but the scores were identical. I didn't bother to save any pictures of these.
    It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes.

    #2
    update, the dual Pentium has either a bad memory slot or something else wrong. the memory works without errors in other boards. hooray for memtest!
    It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes.

    Comment


      #3
      Remember the old advice? read the F******* manual? Get this, just after the cache setting is a setting called deturbo. The manual says, turning this ON will essentially make your system run at 286 speeds. (I'm paraphrasing here) It also says the DEFAULT setting is OFF. Well, I go and check the bios, and its ON. on BOTH boards. Apparently in the latest bios, they changed the default setting from off to on. I tested this by resetting the bios. Here are the benchmark results!

      2x 200mhz 256kb cache
      http://imgur.com/Pm0pJ

      2x 200mhz 1mb cache
      http://imgur.com/d2NLK

      2x 333mhz 512kb cache (overdrive)
      http://imgur.com/3kLvx

      If it EVER find the programmer at Asus that pulled this little stunt, I will get on a plane, goto his house, and KICK HIS DOG. I've been hitting my head on the wall from about 1pm to about 15 minutes ago. That said, I don't know if this is the drian bamage talking but having this fixed so I can get onto tackling NT4 does feel good.
      It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes.

      Comment


        #4
        I was going to say it probably has a turbo setting somewhere.....
        What I collect: 68K/Early PPC Mac, DOS/Win 3.1 era machines, Amiga/ST, C64/128
        Nubus/ISA/VLB/MCA/EISA cards of all types
        Boxed apps and games for the above systems
        Analog video capture cards/software and complete systems

        Comment


          #5
          Turbo settings make sense as a switch. But in the bios? This is the first Pentium I've owned that has that "feature" and seriously, why on EARTH would you do this? I mean seriously, who would drop $5000 on processors alone, then use a bios setting to make them run like a 286.

          Oh well, I'm just happy its working now. I just need to remember to turn the deturbo off on my other board if I need to use it or sell it.
          It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes.

          Comment


            #6
            Some real old software installers had timing loops that would crash the install, maybe it was a way around that? Anyway since you have it working no big deal.
            What I collect: 68K/Early PPC Mac, DOS/Win 3.1 era machines, Amiga/ST, C64/128
            Nubus/ISA/VLB/MCA/EISA cards of all types
            Boxed apps and games for the above systems
            Analog video capture cards/software and complete systems

            Comment


              #7
              Also in the news, the dual Socket 7 tyan I have, the one that failed memory tests? Upon further examination it turned out that removing the cache resulted in the 100,000 errors by test #2 went to ZERO errors. Further trouble shooting revealed that the on-motherboard tag ram needed 2 jumpers to be enabled to be functional. This was not the case. Now I have the full 512mb of cacheable ram AND zero memory errors! WOOPIEE!! I'm 2 for 2 tonight!
              It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes.

              Comment


                #8
                Do those Overdrive CPU's have full speed L2 cache like the original Pentium Pros?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by dan87951 View Post
                  Do those Overdrive CPU's have full speed L2 cache like the original Pentium Pros?
                  yes, they do
                  What I collect: 68K/Early PPC Mac, DOS/Win 3.1 era machines, Amiga/ST, C64/128
                  Nubus/ISA/VLB/MCA/EISA cards of all types
                  Boxed apps and games for the above systems
                  Analog video capture cards/software and complete systems

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X