Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules and Etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Rule 1: Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Rule 2: Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Rule 3: Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


Rule 4: "PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Rule 5: Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

Complete Seattle Computer Products 8086

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Complete Seattle Computer Products 8086

    Hi all,

    I may have the chance to obtain this, but I'm not familiar with this line. Can anyone offer suggestions on making an offer?

    "I have a complete Seattle Computer Products S-100 system with 8086 CPU, CPU Supplement Board, 256K Static RAM (4 SCP cards), floppy controller, multi-serial, etc. It has 3 x 8" floppy drives and 2 x 5.25" drives, plus a Televideo 950 terminal. It's in perfect condition with several original manuals. I have several boxes of 8" floppy disks including compilers for various languages (including Borland's Turbo Pascal 3.0), word processors, assemblers and more."
    Latest Acquisitions: ADDS Envoy, Sun 3/50, Teletype BLIT, DECMate II
    Still Wanted: Ithaca Intersystems DPS-1, SSB Chieftain, Altos 2086, TRS-80 Model 16, Victory FACTOR
    Always looking for: AT&T 3B2's and UnixPC/3B1's.
    http://www.securix.net/retrotekvintagecomputers

    #2
    That would be a great find and a fairly rare setup. Assuming boards (not a S-100 complete sysrem), well into the 100's I would estimate.

    They were in fact a fairly well known company. Being the precursor to MS-DOS -- a long story.
    See:-
    http://s100computers.com/Hardware%20...ry/History.htm

    Comment


      #3
      Additional details about the system

      Too funny, but I came to this forum to post the same question about the same system that Securix is asking about. It's my system! (See attached image)

      Here are some details:
      1 x SCP-210 CPU Board
      1 x SCP-301 CPU Support Board
      1 x SCP-110 64K Static RAM Board (qty 4)
      1 x SCP-500 Disk Master Disk Controller
      1 x SCP-400 Multiport Serial Card
      3 x QumeTrak 8" Floppy Drives
      2 x 5.25" Floppy drives (I think 8 sector 160K/320K drives)
      1 x Televideo 950 Terminal
      1 x 18 slot backplane

      Original docs for the cards listed above and 2 volumes about DOS programming and usage. I also have a box of Dysan 8" floppies that is still shrink wrapped, plus lots of other programs and the original Seattle Computer Products labeled DOS disks (MS-DOS 2.0)

      Everything works.

      I'm trying to figure out what a system like this might be worth. I'm guessing the historical link to Tim Paterson and QDOS/86-DOS/MS-DOS could be significant. Plus, the system is complete and functional. I appreciate any insights you guys can offer.
      Attached Files
      Last edited by mkstabd; November 22, 2009, 02:59 PM. Reason: Adding note about attached image

      Comment


        #4
        One more image

        One more image. Top down view of the inside of the S-100 enclosure. (See attached)
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by mkstabd View Post
          Too funny, but I came to this forum to post the same question about the same system that Securix is asking about. It's my system! (See attached image)
          Hah, well, small world of vintage collectors I guess.

          It's a gorgeous, clean system...definitely interested in making an offer.
          Latest Acquisitions: ADDS Envoy, Sun 3/50, Teletype BLIT, DECMate II
          Still Wanted: Ithaca Intersystems DPS-1, SSB Chieftain, Altos 2086, TRS-80 Model 16, Victory FACTOR
          Always looking for: AT&T 3B2's and UnixPC/3B1's.
          http://www.securix.net/retrotekvintagecomputers

          Comment


            #6
            This is a 1981-83 system. Check Byte mags of this era for ads. This is one of the IEEE 696 class systems, a later S-100 competing in the business market. A peer of California Computer Systems 2200, Compupro, Action Computer Enterprise, etc. If the Televideo terminal came with the system, that will help put a date on it too, if you can't find any ads for the computer itself. I think it's a cool system, I hope you can come to an agreement.
            Bill
            @ BillDeg:
            Web: vintagecomputer.net
            Twitter: @billdeg
            Youtube: @billdeg
            Unauthorized Bio

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by mkstabd View Post
              the original Seattle Computer Products labeled DOS disks (MS-DOS 2.0)
              This could be the "prize" of the system.

              The S-100 bus machine is nice, especially working, but it's not super-rare or super valuable, IMO. There are lots of early 1980s S-100 machines out there.

              The Seattle Computer Products/Microsoft DOS story makes an early copy of SCP DOS (Q-DOS) worth bank, but this appears to be a later, post Microsoft, copy which means that it's probably not worth as much although the 8" MS-DOS disks are pretty damn cool.

              Good luck to you both!
              The Vintage Computer and Gaming Marketplace
              The Vintage Computer

              Comment


                #8
                I agree.

                The whole class of 80's S-100 systems running exotic versions of DOS, CPM, Concurrent DOS, Pascal, etc. is worth exploring historically.

                This class of system may have been one of the casualties left by the introduction of the IBM PC / ISA bus, but in 1981 the S-100's were still more powerful than the 5150.

                Imagine if you were going to buy a small business computer and having to choose between the IBM PC and a Seattle CP system capable of supporting 256K RAM, various versions of DOS and CP/M, 8086/8085/Z80, 8" drives. It's not a surprise that many people chose the more-known S-100 route in 1981. The advantage did not last obviously.

                If you ask me, the difference came down to CP/M vs. DOS, IBM marketing vs. local distributors, and availability of a more broad library of IBM software. As painful as it was in the early DOS days to get a printer to work with a PC, it was always harder to duplicate the same task on a CP/M system.

                How many copies of IBM CP/M 86 were purchased and of those how many were chucked/never opened? Does anyone have one? CP/M was great for it's time, but MS DOS is better in so many ways.

                I am now ducking to avoid the things being thrown at me.

                Bill
                @ BillDeg:
                Web: vintagecomputer.net
                Twitter: @billdeg
                Youtube: @billdeg
                Unauthorized Bio

                Comment


                  #9
                  More info

                  I've been doing a lot more research on my system this week. I was able to get Tim Paterson himself to look at my system pics and he confirmed a couple of things: all of the cards are definitely Seattle Computer Products (SCP), but the drives and S-100 enclosure are from another source. (He helped design some of the cards, BTW) That being said, the enclosures are indeed commercial grade, nevertheless. I'm not sure who built the system. There are no markings of any kind on the cases. I have the original SCP manuals for all the cards, plus SCP documentation for MS-DOS Programming and User's Guides. Plus, SCP DOS disks. So, I guess one could argue that the box is essentially an SCP box.

                  Here's a link to a quick and dirty website I threw together to show more details and photos. I'm adding to this daily until I get it all captured. I've also just disassembled, cleaned and reassembled it so that I could 1) get the dust out of it and 2) get any markings I could find photographed and cataloged.

                  Based upon the copyright dates in the docs (anywhere from 1981 through 1984), this is definitely a post Microsoft box as Erik asserted.

                  Tim Paterson also told me that he, unfortunately, didn't keep a copy of QDOS or 86-DOS (I had asked him to share a copy . His earliest copy is the same as my earliest copy: MS-DOS v1.25. I found copies of 86-DOS on the 'net, but no QDOS. I have a picture of my original diskettes with SCP MS-DOS v2.0 labels on my site.

                  The Computer History Museum in Silicon Valley has an SCP suggested retail price list in their archives from 1983. I would very much like to see that! Would anyone happen to live in the Bay area and have a camera phone? hehe

                  Ty
                  Last edited by mkstabd; November 25, 2009, 11:28 AM.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Just read your website.

                    Kinda off topic, but if you kept this, did you keep your IBM compatible you bought in 1987?
                    I have a Major in Post-Apocalyptic Economics.
                    Wanted: Any PC-Compatible Reciprocation Dingle Arm

                    Comment


                      #11
                      No PCs

                      No, I didn't keep it. I started a software business in 1987 that required us to build clones that supported PC-MOS/386 as multi-user servers, so I sold that off as inventory early on. I did, however, start collecting Sun boxes for several years. I'm selling off most of that collection so I can obsess over Macs for awhile. In the meantime, I'm totally distracted by my S-100 system.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Found a probable match on the enclosure

                        FINALLY, a break! I may have found a match for my system. It turns out my enclosures look identical to the ones used by NNC Electronics, or "No Name Computers". There is a good picture at this link. While this is not my exact case, it is too similar not to be a match. Does anyone know about "No Name Computers" or NNC Electronics? If this is my system, then all I'm missing is a badge.

                        This would also make sense given that "NNC 100" is displayed on the backplane and "NNC-100-2" is cast into the back of the front plate of my dual floppy drive enclosure. I am trying to research this company. Someone with access to Byte Magazine or something similar will probably be able to find my system quickly. Probably between 1983 and 1984. Cool!

                        Update: Here are some more pics that help me confirm I indeed have an NNC (enclosure, at least): pic1 and pic2 from Herb's old computers site. He has them listed as Vector Graphics, but the emblem on the front panel says NNC Electronics. I think he's refering to the CPU card. The enclosure in these pics is a dead-on match.

                        Update 2: Here's a link where someone talks about NNC (aka "No Name Computers") making enclosures with main boards and power supplies only. If this is what I have, then they at least made my dual floppy case and my S-100 case, and probably the 3rd external floppy case as well.
                        Last edited by mkstabd; November 26, 2009, 07:25 PM. Reason: Added links to more pics

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Hi! Funny! That NNC is my Vector Graphic system I restored a year or so ago. It works great. I think NNC formed out of the remains of Vector Graphic since the NNC machines internally were 100% VG except for the case logo.

                          Thanks and have a nice day!

                          Andrew Lynch

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Small world!

                            Hi, Andrew! LOL, the vintage computer community is a small world indeed! That's a very nice looking system. What kind of shape was it in when you started your restoration?

                            I was very glad to find those photos. It's been quite a challenge for me to identify my system and the photos really helped.

                            I noticed you refer to your machine as your Vector Graphics system, even though it sounds like it was originally assembled by NNC and is badged as such. I'm convinced my enclosures are NNC too, just without the badge. Since my system is 100% Seattle Computer Products cards inside an NNC enclosure, I'm still reluctant to call it a Seattle Computer Products machine. I mean, the argument could be made that it's effectively an SCP box since it has all SCP guts that initializes with an SCP monitor and boots SCP labeled DOS disks. How should I identify this system when someone asks me what "system" I have? I want to be able to give an accurate answer that doesn't misrepresent anything, but saying "Seattle Computer Products cards in an NNC enclosure with 3 Qume external drives, also in NNC enclosures, and a Televideo 950 terminal" takes too long to say!!

                            Thanks a lot,

                            Ty

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by mkstabd View Post
                              The Computer History Museum in Silicon Valley has an SCP suggested retail price list in their archives from 1983. I would very much like to see that! Would anyone happen to live in the Bay area and have a camera phone? hehe

                              Ty
                              I should be able to scan that. Do you have any way to dump the SCP eprom?
                              Also, I don't think we have a complete set of docs in the museum collection, is there any way to get copies?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X