Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules and Etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Rule 1: Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Rule 2: Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Rule 3: Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


Rule 4: "PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Rule 5: Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

Running CPM3 on a PC is a "DOS Box"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Running CPM3 on a PC is a "DOS Box"

    I hope the more experienced CPM users on this forum will excuse this, but a number of people have asked me how to edit, assemble (even test) CPM programs for old S-100 systems on a PC. There is are many ways to do this of course but to get newcomers started, I have written up ONE approach to do this using Peter Schornís AltairZ80 Simulator. It can be seen here:-

    http://s100computers.com/Software%20...20Software.htm

    #2
    It all depends. Do you want to run the programs running in an isolated box or do you want them fully integrated in your Windows/DOS environment? Two different approaches.
    Reach me: vcfblackhole _at_ protonmail dot com.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Chuck(G) View Post
      It all depends. Do you want to run the programs running in an isolated box or do you want them fully integrated in your Windows/DOS environment? Two different approaches.
      how to edit, assemble (even test) CPM programs for old S-100 systems on a PC
      This leads me to believe that the point is to do it isolated, since it's testing for the native environment.
      More commonly known as "Yushatak" - www.yushatak.com
      Focused on 486 and Pentium Machines
      I collect All-In-One PCs and Keyboard PCs, especially Compaq.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Raven View Post
        This leads me to believe that the point is to do it isolated, since it's testing for the native environment.
        Nope, not really--there are a few emulators that allow one to use DOS files and run commands from a DOS command prompt. So, for instance one can code a file using one's favorite windows/DOS editor and compile and run without leaving the DOS session. SInce CP/M systems are as varied as flowers that bloom in the spring, there is no one "native environment", not even for S-100 systems.

        I think I speak from a position of some authority.
        Reach me: vcfblackhole _at_ protonmail dot com.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Chuck(G) View Post
          Nope, not really--there are a few emulators that allow one to use DOS files and run commands from a DOS command prompt. So, for instance one can code a file using one's favorite windows/DOS editor and compile and run without leaving the DOS session. SInce CP/M systems are as varied as flowers that bloom in the spring, there is no one "native environment", not even for S-100 systems.

          I think I speak from a position of some authority.
          Well, our young friend often speaks from a somewhat different position...

          I understand there's a CP/M emulator out there called 22NICE; do you happen to know if it works in the pre-XP/2K versions of Windows, or just DOS?

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by MikeS View Post
            Well, our young friend often speaks from a somewhat different position...

            I understand there's a CP/M emulator out there called 22NICE; do you happen to know if it works in the pre-XP/2K versions of Windows, or just DOS?
            My 2 cts...

            It SHOULD be able to operate in a Windows that is NOT NT/2K/XP-related... as you likely know, they have 'absolute power' over peripherals... particularly the floppy drives...
            I have an emulator for my Tandy 4p that does just fine... even in XP, except for the FD access issue.
            Oh yeah... and the fact that I have a 'nonstandard' IDE controller in my 'real' hardware, too!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by MikeS View Post
              Well, our young friend often speaks from a somewhat different position...

              I understand there's a CP/M emulator out there called 22NICE; do you happen to know if it works in the pre-XP/2K versions of Windows, or just DOS?
              I run it under XP. While it's true that some programs may access the hardware directly, there's a way to trap that within the emulator if one wants.

              I note that the topic is CP/M 3, however, not 2.2. I'm not sure why an assembly would require 3.0, but that is a very different situation. 22Nice emulates a CP/M 2.2 environment, as do most other emulation packages. CP/M 3.0 requires bankswitching hardware and a rather more complex BIOS.

              If a true CP/M 3.0 emulation is required YAZE-AG is pretty decent. There apparently is also a SIMH adaptation that does it also, or at least claims to have that capability. Herb Johnson has a rundown of emulators on his Retrotechnology site.
              Reach me: vcfblackhole _at_ protonmail dot com.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by MikeS View Post
                Well, our young friend often speaks from a somewhat different position...

                I understand there's a CP/M emulator out there called 22NICE; do you happen to know if it works in the pre-XP/2K versions of Windows, or just DOS?
                Yeah excuse my perspective, I'll just creep back out of CP/M land - I really don't belong here, heh.
                More commonly known as "Yushatak" - www.yushatak.com
                Focused on 486 and Pentium Machines
                I collect All-In-One PCs and Keyboard PCs, especially Compaq.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Chuck(G) View Post
                  I run it under XP. While it's true that some programs may access the hardware directly, there's a way to trap that within the emulator if one wants.

                  I note that the topic is CP/M 3, however, not 2.2. I'm not sure why an assembly would require 3.0, but that is a very different situation. 22Nice emulates a CP/M 2.2 environment, as do most other emulation packages. CP/M 3.0 requires bankswitching hardware and a rather more complex BIOS.

                  If a true CP/M 3.0 emulation is required YAZE-AG is pretty decent. There apparently is also a SIMH adaptation that does it also, or at least claims to have that capability. Herb Johnson has a rundown of emulators on his Retrotechnology site.
                  The 4/4p emulator I have is more a machine emulator rather than being a CP/M emulator... it will run TRSDOS for the 4/4p and is set up to even handle default hard-drive configurations. Because of it, I was able to get my 4p working with an IDE HD.

                  I hope (in the near future) to convert to CPM-3 tho I will have to 'create' it since I havent been able to find it for the Model 4/4p (tho I know it existed)...

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Raven View Post
                    Yeah excuse my perspective, I'll just creep back out of CP/M land - I really don't belong here, heh.
                    Pshaw, everyone's welcome; expand your horizons with some real vintage hardware, not those boring PC toys of yours...

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by leeb View Post
                      The 4/4p emulator I have is more a machine emulator rather than being a CP/M emulator... it will run TRSDOS for the 4/4p and is set up to even handle default hard-drive configurations. Because of it, I was able to get my 4p working with an IDE HD.

                      I hope (in the near future) to convert to CPM-3 tho I will have to 'create' it since I havent been able to find it for the Model 4/4p (tho I know it existed)...
                      AFAIK, the basic CP/M 3 OEM kit is online. So all you have to do is write a CBIOS and XIOS. Should be a lot simpler than an MS-DOS or *nix port. Do your XIOS right and you can use it for MP/M with very few modifications. Few people realize that CP/M 3 is basically a single-console version of MP/M.
                      Reach me: vcfblackhole _at_ protonmail dot com.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Chuck(G) View Post
                        AFAIK, the basic CP/M 3 OEM kit is online. So all you have to do is write a CBIOS and XIOS. Should be a lot simpler than an MS-DOS or *nix port. Do your XIOS right and you can use it for MP/M with very few modifications. Few people realize that CP/M 3 is basically a single-console version of MP/M.
                        Ah...
                        I believe, in truth, that MP/M is actually a 'ported-and-relieved and stroked-and-bored' version of CP/M-3...
                        It does 140 in the top end, floored.

                        Ive just been too freaking lazy to piecemeal the original BIOS... not to mention that Im used to my own assembler and would have to learn another one... not that I shouldnt!

                        Besides, if I make CP/M-3 work, I'll have to replace the defective 2nd bank of RAMS... and that is SOOOO expensive. (NOT!)
                        Last edited by leeb; May 22, 2010, 10:32 PM.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          How about Virtual Box? Does anyone have a CD image (ISO please) that I can use to unstall CP/M-86 into a small virtual PC on my notebook?

                          Thanks,

                          Art
                          Art G. Granzeier III, President
                          Granzeier Consulting
                          www.granzeier.com
                          Helping to Build a Better Engineer

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by leeb View Post
                            Ah...
                            I believe, in truth, that MP/M is actually a 'ported-and-relieved and stroked-and-bored' version of CP/M-3...
                            It does 140 in the top end, floored:
                            Actually, MP/M came first, then CP/M 3 (or CP/M Plus, if you will). I've got an early version of MP/M; it's pretty unstable.
                            Reach me: vcfblackhole _at_ protonmail dot com.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X