Announcement

Collapse

Forum etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


"PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

Computers with x86 add-on cards.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Computers with x86 add-on cards.

    There's a good thread going about various systems that had customised versions of MS-Dos so I thought I'd start one about about non-IBM compatable systems that had x86 add-on cards that in combination with some software to interact with it's native OS and add-on card interact with that systems hardware using suitable drivers where needed. I know there where quite a few over the years.

    I'll start with the Acorn RiscPC. A number of so called x86 co-processor boards where made available to run on these with 486 class processors on them. There is a connector on the planar specifically designed to take these behind the ARM(Acorn Risc Machine) processor card and shares the system bus for i/o, video etc. The ones I have are: TI486SLX-40, TI 486DX4/100 and IBM 5x86c. The second two can have their processors swapped out. The software run in RiscOS is called called !PC Pro by Alpha 1 Ltd, with different version shipped with the different processors. This software got more feature richer with each new version. This software creates a file of the size you chose to install Dos etc. and initiates the x86 processor in RiscOS from an icon on the desktop.

    I've tried PC/MS/DR Dos 5/6x along with PC Geos, Win3.1 on these myself. Others have used Windows 9x. The software can be run windowed within RiscOS or full screen, with full screen being obviously quicker. Nothing particularly special about the dos version-ie not customised for use on these systems. True 32bit OSs such as OS/2 or WinNT aren't suitable though. Nice thing with these systems is the fdd is 1.44/720k compatible and can read/write/format disks for use in RiscOS, Dos and Atari systems.

    Blurry pic below of the 3 cards etc.

    I'd like to hear about the systems other members had add-on x86 cards for.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Caluser2000; February 7, 2015, 11:31 AM. Reason: Added bit & corrections.
    Thomas Byers (DRI)- "You'll have a million people using the A> [MS-DOS prompt] forever. You'll have five million using [nongraphic] menu systems such as Topview, Concurrent PC-DOS, Desq, and those types. But there'll be 50 to 100 million using the iconic-based interfaces."

    #2
    I have cards to run DOS on the Epson QX10 and the AT&T 7300, if that's what you have in mind.

    Comment


      #3
      Apple Macintosh (the original). cf. MacCharlie

      Comment


        #4
        MacCharlie wasn't an add-in x86 card that resided inside a system but basicly an x86 box, with it's own drive/s, attached via the serial port using the Mac as a terminal.

        Originally posted by GottaLottaStuff View Post
        I have cards to run DOS on the Epson QX10 and the AT&T 7300, if that's what you have in mind.
        That's the type of thing I was referring to and the likes of Amiga bridgeboards.
        Last edited by Caluser2000; February 7, 2015, 12:43 PM.
        Thomas Byers (DRI)- "You'll have a million people using the A> [MS-DOS prompt] forever. You'll have five million using [nongraphic] menu systems such as Topview, Concurrent PC-DOS, Desq, and those types. But there'll be 50 to 100 million using the iconic-based interfaces."

        Comment


          #5
          Ah, so like the Sun IPC board or the HP9000 series 300 DOS coprocessor board.

          There were quite a few of those types of things.

          There were also "reverse" boards--for example, the Opus Unix board that allowed a PC to run Sun's Unix.
          Last edited by Chuck(G); February 7, 2015, 01:08 PM.

          Comment


            #6
            Yeah that type of thing Chuck. Pics of those and peoples experiences using them would be great. More interested in x86 cards for this thread though.
            Last edited by Caluser2000; February 7, 2015, 01:17 PM.
            Thomas Byers (DRI)- "You'll have a million people using the A> [MS-DOS prompt] forever. You'll have five million using [nongraphic] menu systems such as Topview, Concurrent PC-DOS, Desq, and those types. But there'll be 50 to 100 million using the iconic-based interfaces."

            Comment


              #7
              The PC Transporter for the Apple II line was a good example... basically a PC/XT clone on an Apple II card. I have one in my IIgs system, the video switch is implemented nicely and CGA looks great on the IIgs RGB monitor.

              With the Superdrive card I have in the system, along with a Microdrive Turbo, I have an NEC V20 based XT clone with 1.44MB floppy support and hard drive. It even uses the IIgs clock to set the XT clock, if you run a little app in autoexec.bat.

              There is a lot of documentation online for the PC transporter, along with sales literature showing pics, here: http://ae.applearchives.com/all_appl...c_transporter/

              Advertising here:

              Comment


                #8
                I also have a couple of Macs with the DOS compatibility cards, one 486DX2/66, I'm not sure if the other is Pentium or not. I haven't done much with them yet though.

                I did use the Apple IIe card in my Mac LCII... not x86 compatible, but a similar concept.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by HoJoPo View Post
                  The PC Transporter for the Apple II line was a good example...
                  Thanks for sharing HoJoPo. That's exactly the type of card I was referring to.
                  Thomas Byers (DRI)- "You'll have a million people using the A> [MS-DOS prompt] forever. You'll have five million using [nongraphic] menu systems such as Topview, Concurrent PC-DOS, Desq, and those types. But there'll be 50 to 100 million using the iconic-based interfaces."

                  Comment


                    #10
                    It wasn't for DOS compatibility, but worth mentioning. Nearly every 3B2 series I/O card was based off the same AT&T CIO reference design which included a 80186. It was basically a x86 single board computer in every I/O slot. But the software was so poorly written, it couldn't drive simple serial ports above 2400 baud or so. I've entertained the notion of building a DOS card for it.
                    "Good engineers keep thick authoritative books on their shelf. Not for their own reference, but to throw at people who ask stupid questions; hoping a small fragment of knowledge will osmotically transfer with each cranial impact." - Me

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Sun had the SunPC cards.

                      [Need something to waste time on? Click here to visit my YouTube channel CelGenStudios]
                      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      [No time for videos? Click here to visit my Twitter feed @CelGenStudios]

                      = Excellent space heater

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Found an old reference on vcf to the Powermac 6100/66 DOS Compatible. Apparently its DOS card used a 486DX2/66, had local bus video on board, plus a mini Soundblaster 16 daughter card.
                        Thomas Byers (DRI)- "You'll have a million people using the A> [MS-DOS prompt] forever. You'll have five million using [nongraphic] menu systems such as Topview, Concurrent PC-DOS, Desq, and those types. But there'll be 50 to 100 million using the iconic-based interfaces."

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Don't forget the Commodore Amiga computers wich have several hardware options to become x86 compatible.

                          - The bridgeboards, full cards able to drive the inactive ISA slots of the A2000/3000/4000 such as the Commodore A2086, A2286 and A2386, with CPU from Intel 8086 to Intel 386sx 25 Mhz (upgradable by user up to 486 SLC3 75Mhz), or third-party cards made by Vortex
                          - some cards which plug into the 68000 socket for A500/A2000 and maybe A1000, such as the Vortex AtOnce and AtOnce plus
                          - some cards which take place in the memory add-on slot of the A500 such as the KCS PowerPC
                          - some cards which take place in a side slot expansion for the A500, such as the GVP 286 add on (connects into a special connector inside a GVP harddrive/RAM/CPU expansion)


                          All these cards share devices with the Amiga OS and are able to multitask. The bridgeboards can drive additional hardware connected to the ISA bus, such as VGA cards, audio cards, IDE/SCSI cards, IO cards, network cards.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I could probably list some propietary industrial controllers with AT-clone-on-a-card solutions but I don't know that that would interest anyone.
                            Be polite and I may let you live.

                            https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...5NBVfKX5471R9U

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Caluser2000 View Post
                              I'll start with the Acorn RiscPC. A number of so called x86 co-processor boards where made available to run on these with 486 class processors on them.
                              I have an Acorn A3020 with an AGA-31 PC card. That one is running an AMD 386sx with 25/33 MHz. Not useful for anything than DOS, though, as video is slow as hell...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X