Announcement

Collapse

Forum etiquette

Our mission ...

This forum is part of our mission to promote the preservation of vintage computers through education and outreach. (In real life we also run events and have a museum.) We encourage you to join us, participate, share your knowledge, and enjoy.

This forum has been around in this format for over 15 years. These rules and guidelines help us maintain a healthy and active community, and we moderate the forum to keep things on track. Please familiarize yourself with these rules and guidelines.


Remain civil and respectful

There are several hundred people who actively participate here. People come from all different backgrounds and will have different ways of seeing things. You will not agree with everything you read here. Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.

Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.

This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.


Stay close to the original topic being discussed
  • If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.)
  • If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. You can always start a new thread instead of potentially "hijacking" an existing thread.



Contribute something meaningful

To put things in engineering terms, we value a high signal to noise ratio. Coming here should not be a waste of time.
  • This is not a chat room. If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. A post should be on topic, clear, and contribute something meaningful to the discussion. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions.
  • Do not bump threads.
  • Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. And even then, that person may have moved on. Just start a new thread for your related topic.
  • Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person.


"PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)

This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.

In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.

Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead:
  • "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM ... the forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting.
  • "How much is shipping to ....": This is a very specific and directed question that is not of interest to anybody else.


Why do we have this policy? Sending a "PM Sent!" type message basically wastes everybody else's time by making them having to scroll past a post in a thread that looks to be updated, when the update is not meaningful. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications' ... if you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.

Copyright and other legal issues

We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law; whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. Do not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.

Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.


Reporting problematic posts

If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. (It looks like an exclamation point in a triangle and it is available under every post.) This send a notification to all of the moderators, so somebody will see it and deal with it.

If you are unsure you may consider sending a private message to a moderator instead.


New user moderation

New users are directly moderated so that we can weed spammers out early. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process; 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.

New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users.


Other suggestions
  • Use Google, books, or other definitive sources. There is a lot of information out there.
  • Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say; we are not mind readers. Be clear and concise.
  • Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.
See more
See less

Apple IIc monochrome monitor help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Apple IIc monochrome monitor help

    I have a IIc monochrome monitor and it has a slow (about 2 or 3 seconds) horizontal wave that moves vertically down the screen. My first thought was to recap the monitor, so I ordered the caps and did the job. I replaced all the caps with the same farad rating, equal or higher voltage rating, and all are 105 degrees vs 85 degrees of the original caps. I powered up the monitor tonight and sadly it still has the slow horizontal wave, but even worse after about 30 seconds of operation C514 (100uf 50v) blew.

    The monitor still displayed an image until I powered it off (a few seconds of fumbling to hit the power switch while my brain registered what just happened). I checked the cap's orientation against the circuit board, as well as a photo I took prior to removing the original caps. I did not install it backwards. I took the cap out and went to measure the voltage across the pads where the cap would be installed, but now the monitor does not power up at all (even though it was still showing a picture before I shut it off previously).

    I should know better than to recap a monitor without knowing how to readjust the power supply circuits afterwards, but I was hoping it would just be fine... I did find the SAMS schematics online and I will start troubleshooting from that, but in the mean time does anyone have any suggestions or known "gotchas" about this monitor?

    #2
    I doubt you will get sufficient HV out of the monitor with C514 removed. Did the original C514 have polarized markings on it (+ and -) ? I'm suspicious of the polarity on it looking at the schematic. I see C513 is obviously drawn backwards polarity too. Most of the energy in the primary of T502 is in the negative direction. I would recommend trying to find maybe 100uf 50v (or better yet 100v) NP (non-polarized) capacitor for C514. Since the unit had same symptoms before and after replacement, the cap blew probably because of polarity or voltage rating. The ripple in the video is most likely from the AC power supply area (the supplies feeding off the line transformer T2). I have one of these that the brightness control is frozen so I will be opening up mine and can look at C514 markings also.

    Larry G

    Comment


      #3
      I was pretty careful about the cap polarity (or lack of polarity in some cases), and making sure the silk screen actually matched the actual cap polarity. Here is a photo of the area with C514 prior to replacement (C514 has the white glue on top of it):

      iic_monitor_c514.jpg

      I'll check the power supply area when I get home.

      Comment


        #4
        I think yours is in backwards !! Look at my photo. C514 white negative band is pointing towards the coil and yours is pointing away. This is weird since it worked all these years so not sure what to think
        IIc Monitor cap.jpg

        Comment


          #5
          That is crazy, since my photo is of the original caps before I started replacing them. It is not a bipolar cap either, and certainly has the negative stripe. I found that fuse F701 had blown, probably when the C514 popped. Replacing that, but leaving C514 out, and the monitor powers up and I can take some voltage readings.

          The first problem is that the 12V regulator will not achieve 12V. 11.5V is the best I can get. I checked the input from the main rectifier, and without a load (F701 out of the circuit) it produces 24V, but with the fuse in and the monitor as a load, the input to the regulator section is pulled down to 14.3V instead of the 18.8V that the datasheet indicates. I'm not sure if the problem is the regulator or something else in the monitor.

          I pulled all the diodes from the rectifier and checked them, they are fine. I also tested the secondary of T2 while I had the diodes out and it was good.

          Finally I tested the voltage across the pads where C514 goes, and surprise, with the meter probes on the + and - pads as the cap would be installed, I read -16V... That explains the cap blowing up. I don't know how the original cap was not blown... I'm going to throw the scope on there next and see if the signal stays on one side of ground. Retrogear, any chance you can take a measurement across C514 or check the markings on the bottom of the PCB? My board has + symbols on most of the caps, and the + is definitely on the side closest to the coil.

          I also still don't know what is causing the horizontal wave, but until I can get the regulator to the proper 12V, I can't be sure of anything.

          Comment


            #6
            Also, does anyone know the part number for the flyback transformer in this monitor? I get nothing when I use the number in the SAMS datasheet.

            Comment


              #7
              http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthrea...ck-replacement

              Seems to be a TMF-2222(1) but replacement parts seem hard to find.

              I also had a very bad horizontal wave on mine, but it ended up being the RCA cable I was using.

              I tested it on an RCA source which was NOT my //c and it was fine. I ordred this cable here (http://www.monoprice.com/product?c_i...seq=1&format=2) which completely eliminated it.

              Comment


                #8
                Yeah, I found that thread and looked for the FB, no luck. The video cable I am using is the one that came with the IIc monitor, and the source is an Apple IIc. But I still don't understand how the monitor worked at all with that original cap. I'm going to put another C514 in according to the voltage I see, and hopefully that will just fix it all. Without C514, maybe the FB is floating, because I'm seeing really high voltages. In some places I am seeing double the voltage off of the FB, according to the SAMS datasheet.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by matthew180 View Post
                  Yeah, I found that thread and looked for the FB, no luck. The video cable I am using is the one that came with the IIc monitor, and the source is an Apple IIc.
                  My IIc monitor combo displayed the same waviness, also with the original cable and I also replaced some caps and the bridge rectifier to no avail. Until I replaced the cable with a quality coaxial cable, then all was good...

                  BTW the circuit diagram is available here: http://apple2online.com/web_documents/Sam's%20Apple%20IIc%20Monitor%20KB.pdf

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Wow, I really hope the problem is not just a bad cable. That would mean the whole "re-cap" was unnecessary and now I have a non-working monitor.

                    I put the scope on the C514 location and it has a huge AC component that goes +/- 400V. Not sure what to make of that, since the DC meter reading was -16V.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      check D17,D18 to pin 7 of the flyback. It should be clamping the + part of the waveform on pin 7 to ground. Make sure your scope ground is on the correct ground

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Ok, tested D17 and D18 in-circuit and they seemed ok, although I should probably remove them just to be sure. However, the signal on pin 7 of the flyback was definitely being clamped on the positive swing of the signal. Using the same ground reference (cathode side of D17,D1 I checked flyback pin 5 again, and the signal is still going positive and negative with a peak to peak of about 400V.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          You could try using two 220 uF caps back to back and connect that combo to pin 5 then measure the voltage across pin 7 to ground.

                          If I read the circuit correctly I would think the polarity of C514 is drawn wrong since pin 7 is positively rectified to ground by D17 and D18 meaning pin 5 would be negative. If however one of the diodes shorts out (maybe under higher voltage) C514 would try to 'shunt' all of the (AC) output to ground and probably pop.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Hello. I stumbled on this thread from a web search after a recap of my own Monitor IIc wound up blowing C514.

                            I wanted to report that on my specimen the silkscreen for C514 on the board is evidently backward: in fact, it's the opposite of what's seen in the pictures here. (There are a few other differences in that board as well. My monitor appears to be from 1984, and the one on that webpage from 1986. That said, the circuit involving C514 appears to be quite similar.)

                            I replaced my blown C514 with another new part, oriented opposite to the way directed by the silkscreen, and the monitor appears to work now. I still have the horizontal ripple that the original poster observed, but I'm hopeful that a replacement cable will fix the problem.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X